Activity-dependent remodeling of genome architecture in engram cells facilitates memory formation and recall.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in neural plasticity, memory, and epileptogenesis.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026
   Review
2. Time-Dependent Transcriptional Dynamics of Contextual Fear Memory Retrieval Reveals the Function of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 9 in Reconsolidation.Neuroscience bulletin · 2025
   Article
3. Unveiling Transcriptional and Epigenetic Mechanisms Within Engram Cells: Insights into Memory Formation and Stability.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
   Review
4. Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration.Cell · 2023
   Article
5. The elusive transcriptional memory trace.Oxford open neuroscience · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.