Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34558210›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2022

The golden jackal (Canis aureus) and the African swine fever pandemic: Its role is controversial but not negligible (a diet analysis study).

Péter Kemenszky, Ferenc Jánoska, Gábor Nagy, Ágnes Csivincsik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Eye to eye withCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. First Morphological and Molecular Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Péter KemenszkyRoth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences, University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary.
Ferenc JánoskaInstitute of Vertebrate Zoology and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary.
Gábor NagyOne Health Working Group, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kaposvár, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4924-6322
Ágnes CsivincsikOne Health Working Group, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kaposvár, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Europe, the African swine fever (ASF) pandemic mostly affects the environmental domain of health, which is a strongly human-impacted ecosystem. However, the current control strategies focus solely on the wild boar and tend to disregard other epidemiologically relevant elements of the ecosystem.

objectivesThis study investigated the potential impact of the golden jackal on the surveillance effort and disease transmission.

methodsFor this reason, the authors analysed the content of 277 stomachs of this canid species within its westernmost inhabitant population, in order to determine the amount of suid remains, disposed.

resultsThe findings confirmed that in a densely populated wild boar habitat, the main diet component of jackals was wild boar all the year round. The jackals disposed of 0.3-0.6 kg/km

conclusionsThis study cannot determine whether canid scavengers positively or negatively influence the control efforts; however, the impact of the jackal should not be disregarded. The results warn the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach to complex epidemiological situations within different ecosystems.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverSwine DiseasesAnimalsDietEcosystemJackalsPandemicsSwineAfrican swine feverdiet analysisgolden jackalOne Healthwild boar

Identifiers

PMID34558210
PMCPMC8788993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.