Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34558058›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2022

Beyond the beak: Brain size and allometry in avian craniofacial evolution.

Jesús Marugán-Lobón, Sergio M Nebreda, Guillermo Navalón, Roger B J Benson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Allometry and phylogenetic divergence: Correspondence or incongruence?Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Developmental origin underlies evolutionary rate variation across the placental skull.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jesús Marugán-LobónUnidad de Paleontología, Dpto. Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3766-8560
Sergio M NebredaUnidad de Paleontología, Dpto. Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-1972
Guillermo NavalónUnidad de Paleontología, Dpto. Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2447-1275
Roger B J BensonDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8244-6177
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County · USUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birds exhibit an enormous variety of beak shapes. Such remarkable variation, however, has distracted research from other important aspects of their skull evolution, the nature of which has been little explored. Key aspects of avian skull variation appear to be qualitatively similar to those of mammals, encompassing variation in the degree of cranial vaulting, cranial base flexure, and the proportions and orientations of the occipital and facial regions. The evolution of these traits has been studied intensively in mammals under the Spatial Packing Hypothesis (SPH), an architectural constraint so-called because the general anatomical organization and development of such skull parts makes them evolve predictably in response to changes in relative brain size. Such SPH predictions account for the different appearances of skull configurations across species, either in having longer or shorter faces, and caudally or ventrally oriented occiputs, respectively. This pattern has been morphometrically and experimentally proven in mammals but has not been examined in birds or other tetrapods, and so its generality remains unknown. We explored the SPH in an interspecific sample of birds using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics. Our results show that the dominant trend of evolutionary variation in the skull of crown-group birds can be predicted by the SPH, involving concomitant changes in the face, the cranial vault and the basicranium, and with striking similarities to craniofacial variation among mammals. Although craniofacial variation is significantly affected by allometry, these allometric effects are independent of the influence of the SPH on skull morphology, as are any effects of volumetric encephalization. Our results, therefore, validate the hypothesis that a general architectural constraint underlies skull homoplasy evolution of cranial morphology among avian clades, and possibly between birds and mammals, but they downplay encephalization and allometry as the only factors involved.

Indexed as

BeakBiological EvolutionAnimalsBirdsOrgan SizePhylogenySkullavianbrainconstraintcranial basecraniofacialgeometric morphometrics

Identifiers

PMID34558058
PMCPMC8742972
OpenAlexW3200125746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.