Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557992›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2022

WIC Participants' Perceptions of COVID-19-Related Changes to WIC Recertification and Service Delivery.

Alison K Ventura, Catherine E Martinez, Shannon E Whaley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alison K VenturaDepartment of Kinesiology and Public Health, Center for Health Research, California Polytechnic State University, One Grand Ave, 43A-371, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA. akventur@calpoly.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2948-4446
Catherine E MartinezDivision of Research and Evaluation, Public Health Foundation Enterprises WIC Program, 12781 Schabarum Ave, Irwindale, CA, 91706, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3000-7153
Shannon E WhaleyDivision of Research and Evaluation, Public Health Foundation Enterprises WIC Program, 12781 Schabarum Ave, Irwindale, CA, 91706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9644-2206

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Healthy Eating Research 76293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) clinics implemented alternatives to in-person service delivery in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including virtual visits and electronic document sharing. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to describe WIC participants' experiences with remote service delivery and recertification during the pandemic. Participants included mothers and infants who participated in a WIC-based intervention between June 2019-August 2020. All participants (N = 246) were invited to complete a follow-up survey between November 2020-February 2021; 185 mothers completed the survey. The survey assessed sociodemographics, employment, food security, experiences with remote WIC recertification and service delivery, and experiences with obtaining WIC foods during the pandemic. Average age for mothers was 29.2 ± 6.3 years and for infants was 17.7  ± .2 months; 80% (n = 147) identified as Hispanic. Approximately 34% (n = 62) of participants reported very low or low food security and 40% (n = 64) had difficulties buying WIC foods during the pandemic. Among participants who recalled providing documentation of income and address virtually, the majority felt comfortable providing information via email (60%) and text messaging (72%). Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with remote methods of service delivery, as well as overall satisfaction with the WIC program during the pandemic. While ~ 25% of study participants preferred for all WIC services to remain remote, 75% still desired at least some in-person contact with WIC staff after the pandemic. In conclusion, remote methods of WIC service delivery addressed existing barriers to WIC participation and were well-received by study participants.

Indexed as

COVID-19Food AssistanceAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantPandemicsPovertyYoung AdultCOVID-19 pandemicLow-incomeNutrition assistanceProgram retentionSpecial Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)

Identifiers

PMID34557992
PMCPMC8459821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.