Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557988›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Mental heartbeat tracking and rating of emotional pictures are not related.

Eszter Ferentzi, Luca Vig, Mats Julin Lindkjølen, Markus Erling Lien, Ferenc Köteles

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eszter FerentziDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. ferentzi.eszter@ppk.elte.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9495-4216
Luca VigDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1882-3326
Mats Julin LindkjølenInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Markus Erling LienInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ferenc KötelesInstitute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5460-5759
Eötvös Loránd University · HU

Funding

New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities ÚNKP-18-3NKFI HKFIH K 124132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to conceptually replicate the findings of previous empirical studies showing that people with higher cardiac interoceptive accuracy experience more intense emotions. Apart of the mental heartbeat tracking task of Schandry, Hungarian (n = 46, 76.0% female, mean age 22.28 ± 2.228) and Norwegian (n = 50, 60.0% female, mean age 24.66 ± 3.048) participants rated the arousal and valence evoked by positive, neutral and negative pictures. Multivariate repeated analysis of variance (applying both frequentist and Bayesian approaches) did not reveal any connection between heartbeat perception scores and the subjective ratings (i.e., arousal and valence) of the pictures in any of the two groups. The lack of the expected association between cardioceptive accuracy and arousal might partly be explained by the methodological differences between previous studies and this one; for example, we did not split or preselected the sample based on the performance on the Schandry task and applied a relatively strict instruction (i.e., by encouraging to count felt heartbeats only, and to report zero if no sensations were detected).

Indexed as

ArousalEmotionsAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34557988
PMCPMC9177488
OpenAlexW3201262201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.