Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557977›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2021

Laboratory diagnosis of mange-causing mites in dogs using a modified centrifugation-flotation technique in sucrose solution.

Felipe Boniedj Ventura Alvares, Vivian Silva Rosa Veleda Meireles, Juliana Trajano da Silva, Larissa Claudino Ferreira, Jossiara Abrante Rodrigues, Roberto Alves Bezerra, Brendo Andrade Lima, Thais Ferreira Feitosa, Vinícius Longo Ribeiro Vilela

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endoparasites in domestic cats (Felis catus) in the semi-arid region of Northeast Brazil.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Felipe Boniedj Ventura AlvaresDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba (IFPB), Sousa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Vivian Silva Rosa Veleda MeirelesDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba (IFPB), Sousa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Juliana Trajano da SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Saúde Animal, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos, PB, Brazil.
Larissa Claudino FerreiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Saúde Animal, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos, PB, Brazil.
Jossiara Abrante RodriguesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Saúde Animal, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos, PB, Brazil.
Roberto Alves BezerraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Saúde Animal, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos, PB, Brazil.
Brendo Andrade LimaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba (IFPB), Sousa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Thais Ferreira FeitosaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba (IFPB), Sousa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Vinícius Longo Ribeiro VilelaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba (IFPB), Sousa, Paraíba, Brazil. vilelavlr@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-7842
Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande · BR

Funding

instituto federal de educação, ciência e tecnologia da paraíba Desenvolvimento Tecnológico e Inovaçãoinstituto federal de educação, ciência e tecnologia da paraíba IFPB - Edital nº 54/2019/ PRPIPG - Programa Institucional de Apoio à Pesquisa
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the skin disorders of dogs, scabies is notable for its high occurrence rate and the need for veterinary interventions. There are two obstacles to making this diagnosis through direct investigation under a microscope (DIM): the continual need to make new slides when the results are negative and the long time needed for reading these slides. Thus, the objective of the present study was to compare efficacy between DIM and the technique of centrifugation-flotation in sucrose solution (CFSS) in samples from dogs in the semiarid region of the state of Paraíba, Brazil. Samples from 136 dogs were used, and three slides were made for each examination (DIM and CFSS). The readings were halted in cases of positivity. Positive samples were obtained from 56.6% of the dogs (77/136), of which 76.6% (59/77) were positive through both techniques, 13% (10/77) only through DIM and 10.4% (8/77) only through CFSS. The positivity rate did not differ statistically between the techniques. CFSS showed higher quality of readings, due to the considerably fewer artifacts on the slides, thereby optimizing the reading time. Sensitivity (85.6%), specificity (88.1%), accuracy (86.8%), positive predictive value (88.1%) and negative predictive value (85.1%) were obtained and the kappa coefficient (0.73) was considered substantial. It was concluded that CFSS showed high diagnostic capacity for scabies, similar to that of DIM, with optimized reading time, fewer artifacts and better display of mites.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesScabiesAnimalsCentrifugationClinical Laboratory TechniquesDogsSarcoptes scabieiSucroseSucroseDemodexDiagnosticsDirect investigation under microscopeDogsMangeSarcoptesScabies

Identifiers

PMID34557977
OpenAlexW3200051816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.