Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557971›Full record

SynthesisArchives of sexual behavior2021

Measurement of Sexual Interests with Pupillary Responses: A Meta-Analysis.

Janice Attard-Johnson, Martin R Vasilev, Caoilte Ó Ciardha, Markus Bindemann, Kelly M Babchishin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of sexual behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mining the Gaps: Rethinking Divergence Between Biological and Self-Report Measures in the Study of Sexual Diversity.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Development of a Sexological Ontology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janice Attard-JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK. jattardjohnson@bournemouth.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0563-0197
Martin R VasilevDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK.
Caoilte Ó CiardhaSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Kent, UK.
Markus BindemannSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Kent, UK.
Kelly M BabchishinDepartment of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective measures of sexual interest are important for research on human sexuality. There has been a resurgence in research examining pupil dilation as a potential index of sexual orientation. We carried out a meta-analytic review of studies published between 1965 and 2020 (Mdn year = 2016) measuring pupil responses to visual stimuli of adult men and women to assess sexual interest. Separate meta-analyses were performed for six sexual orientation categories. In the final analysis, 15 studies were included for heterosexual men (N = 550), 5 studies for gay men (N = 65), 4 studies for bisexual men (N = 124), 13 studies for heterosexual women (N = 403), and 3 studies for lesbian women (N = 132). Only heterosexual and gay men demonstrated discrimination in pupillary responses that was clearly in line with their sexual orientation, with greater pupil dilation to female and male stimuli, respectively. Bisexual men showed greater pupil dilation to male stimuli. Although heterosexual women exhibited larger pupils to male stimuli compared to female stimuli, the magnitude of the effect was small and non-significant. Finally, lesbian women displayed greater pupil dilation to male stimuli. Three methodological moderators were identified-the sexual explicitness of stimulus materials, the measurement technique of pupillary response, and inclusion of self-report measures of sexual interest. These meta-analyses are based on a limited number of studies and are therefore preliminary. However, the results suggest that pupillary measurement of sexual interest is promising for men and that standardization is essential to gain a better understanding of the validity of this measurement technique for sexual interest.

Indexed as

HeterosexualitySexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultBisexualityFemaleHumansMalePupilSexual BehaviorMeta-analysisPupil dilationSexual arousalSexual interestSexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID34557971
PMCPMC8604861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.