Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557937›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2022

Dynamic susceptibility MR perfusion imaging of the brain: not a question of contrast agent molarity.

Valentina Panara, Piero Chiacchiaretta, Matteo Rapino, Valerio Maruotti, Matteo Parenti, Eleonora Piccirilli, Andrea Delli Pizzi, Massimo Caulo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valentina PanaraDepartment of Radiology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti, Chieti, Italy. valentinapanara81@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-3926
Piero ChiacchiarettaDepartment of Psychological, Health and Territory Sciences, University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti, Pescara, Italy.
Matteo RapinoDepartment of Radiology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Valerio MaruottiDepartment of Radiology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Matteo ParentiITAB - Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti, Via Luigi Polacchi 11, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Eleonora PiccirilliDepartment of Radiology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Andrea Delli PizziDepartment of Radiology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Massimo CauloDepartment of Radiology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
University of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion-weighted MR imaging (PWI) is increasingly used in clinical neuroimaging for a range of conditions. More highly concentrated GBCAs (e.g., gadobutrol) are often preferred for DSC imaging because it is thought that more Gd is present in the volume of interest during first pass for a given equivalent injection rate. However, faster injection of a less viscous GBCA (e.g., gadoteridol) might generate a more compact and narrower contrast bolus thus obviating any perceived benefit of higher Gd concentration. This preliminary study aimed to analyze and compare DSC examinations in the healthy brain hemisphere of patients with brain tumors using gadobutrol and gadoteridol administered at injection rates of 4 and 6 mL/s.

methodsThirty-nine brain tumor patients studied with DSC-PWI were evaluated. A simplified gamma-variate model function was applied to calculate the mean peak, area under the curve (AUC), and full-width at half-maximum (FHWM) of concentration-time curves derived from ΔR2* signals at four different regions-of-interest (ROIs). Qualitative assessment of the derived CBV maps was also performed independently by 2 neuroradiologists.

resultsNo qualitative or quantitative differences between the two GBCAs were observed when administered at a flow rate of 4 mL/s. At a flow rate of 6 mL/s, gadoteridol showed lower FWHM values.

conclusionGadobutrol and gadoteridol are equivalent for clinical assessment of qualitative CBV maps and quantitative perfusion parameters (FHWM) at a flow rate of 4 mL/s. At 6 mL/s, gadoteridol produces a narrower bolus shape and potentially improves quantitative assessment of perfusion parameters.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsOrganometallic CompoundsBrainContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPerfusionPerfusion ImagingContrast MediaOrganometallic CompoundsDynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)GadobutrolGadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)GadoteridolPerfusion-weighted imaging (PWI)

Identifiers

PMID34557937
OpenAlexW3201386322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.