Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557855›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2021

International versus national growth charts for identifying small and large-for-gestational age newborns: A population-based study in 15 European countries.

Alice Hocquette, Mélanie Durox, Rachael Wood, Kari Klungsøyr, Katarzyna Szamotulska, Sylvan Berrut, Tonia Rihs, Theopisti Kyprianou, Luule Sakkeus, Aline Lecomte and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 16 countries.

Alice HocquetteUniversité de Paris, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRA, F-75004 Paris, France.
Mélanie DuroxUniversité de Paris, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRA, F-75004 Paris, France.
Rachael WoodPublic Health Scotland, Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Kari KlungsøyrDivision of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway and Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.
Katarzyna SzamotulskaInstitute of Mother and Child, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Warsaw, Poland.
Sylvan BerrutFederal Statistical Office FSO, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Tonia RihsFederal Statistical Office FSO, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Theopisti KyprianouHealth Monitoring Unit, Ministry of Health, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Luule SakkeusEstonian Institute for Population Studies, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.
Aline LecomteDepartment of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg.
Irisa ZileThe Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Sophie AlexanderUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, School of Public Health, Perinatal Epidemiology and Reproductive health Unit, Brussels, Belgium.
Jeannette KlimontStatistics Austria, Vienna, Austria.
Henrique BarrosUniversity of Porto Medical School, Department of Public Health, Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Porto, Portugal.
Miriam GattDirectorate for Health Information and Research, National Obstetric Information Systems (NOIS) Register, Tal-Pietà, Malta.
Jelena IsakovaInstitute of Hygiene, Health Information Centre, Health Statistics Department, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Béatrice BlondelUniversité de Paris, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRA, F-75004 Paris, France.
Mika GisslerTHL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Information Services Department, Helsinki and Karolinska Institute, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jennifer ZeitlinUniversité de Paris, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRA, F-75004 Paris, France.
Inserm · FRFederal Statistical Office · CHEdinburgh College · GBHealth Information Management · BEKarolinska Institutet · SELithuanian Social Research Centre · LTLuxembourg Institute of Health · LUMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NORiga Technical College · LVStatistics Austria · ATTallinn University · EEUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo inform the on-going debate about the use of universal prescriptive versus national intrauterine growth charts, we compared perinatal mortality for small and large-for-gestational-age (SGA/LGA) infants according to international and national charts in Europe.

methodsWe classified singleton births from 33 to 42 weeks of gestation in 2010 and 2014 from 15 countries (

findingsSGA and LGA prevalence using national charts were near 10% in all countries, but varied according to international charts with a north to south gradient (3.0% to 10.1% and 24.9% to 8.0%, respectively). Compared with appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants by both charts, risk of perinatal mortality was increased for SGA by both charts (aOR[95%

interpretationUsing international instead of national charts in Europe could lead to growth restricted infants being reclassified as having normal growth, while infants with low risks of mortality could be reclassified as having excessive growth.

fundingInfAct Joint Action, CHAFEA Grant n°801,553 and EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking ConcePTION grant n°821,520. AH received a PhD grant from EHESP.

Indexed as

fetal growthfetal growth chartslarge for gestational agesmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID34557855
PMCPMC8454535
OpenAlexW3186515356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.