Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557843›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2021

Daytime and outcomes after cardiac surgery: Systematic review and metaanalysis, insights from a large UK database review and post-hoc trial analysis.

Daniel Paul Fudulu, Arnaldo Dimagli, Lauren Dixon, Manraj Sandhu, Lucia Cocomello, Gianni D Angelini, Umberto Benedetto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Paul FuduluBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8HW UK.
Arnaldo DimagliBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8HW UK.
Lauren DixonBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8HW UK.
Manraj SandhuBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8HW UK.
Lucia CocomelloBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8HW UK.
Gianni D AngeliniBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8HW UK.
Umberto BenedettoBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8HW UK.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1992027/7163British Heart Foundation PG/14/72/31080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have suggested a variation of myocardial tolerance to ischaemia depending on the daytime of surgery. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a three-level analysis: metaanalysis, national patient-level dataset analysis and a post-hoc trial analysis.

methodsWe first performed a systematic review and metaanalysis of available studies comparing clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery performed in the morning (am) versus afternoon (pm). Then, we interrogated the UK national adult cardiac surgery audit database (NACSA) and analysed the am or pm outcomes of patients undergoing non-emergency aortic valve replacement (AVR) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In a post-hoc analysis, we further investigated the effect of time of surgery on serum troponin release and ventricular myocardial biopsy adenine nucleotide metabolism.

resultsA total of 18377 patients undergoing uncomplicated isolated CABG or isolated AVR on the same day am or pm were included in the metaanalysis. Meta-analytic estimates showed no difference in the risk of MI between patients operated in pm vs am (OR 1.02, 95% CI:0.79-1.32) and in the risk of mortality (OR 1.1, 95% CI:0.85-1.42). Outcomes of 91248 patients from the NACSA dataset were analysed according to the daytime of the procedure. Patient-level analysis showed no significant effect of daytime for both isolated AVR (p=0.094) and isolated CABG (p=0.425). Finally, we performed a post-hoc trial database analysis in 124 patients undergoing isolated AVR or CABG of serial cardiac troponin and nucleotides metabolism on ventricular myocardial biopsies. We found no significant diurnal changes in the perioperative cardiac troponin release or nucleotide metabolism in the AVR (p=0.30) or the CABG cohort (p=0.97).

conclusionThe present three-level analysis found no evidence that daytime influences clinical outcomes and myocardial injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Identifiers

PMID34557843
PMCPMC8454590
OpenAlexW3170589207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.