Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557676›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2021

Exploring Seasonal and Circadian Rhythms in Structural Traits of Field Maize from LiDAR Time Series.

Shichao Jin, Yanjun Su, Yongguang Zhang, Shilin Song, Qing Li, Zhonghua Liu, Qin Ma, Yan Ge, LingLi Liu, Yanfeng Ding and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Deep learning for three-dimensional (3D) plant phenomics.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shichao JinPlant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-336X
Yanjun SuState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Yongguang ZhangJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8286-300X
Shilin SongState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Qing LiNational Technique Innovation Center for Regional Wheat Production/Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095 Jiangsu, China.
Zhonghua LiuState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Qin MaDepartment of Forestry, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State 39759, USA.
Yan GePlant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
LingLi LiuState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Yanfeng DingPlant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Frédéric BaretPlant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7655-8997
Qinghua GuoDepartment of Ecology, College of Environmental Sciences, and Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth rhythm in structural traits is important for better understanding plant response to the ever-changing environment. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) is a well-suited tool to study structural rhythm under field conditions. Recent studies have used TLS to describe the structural rhythm of trees, but no consistent patterns have been drawn. Meanwhile, whether TLS can capture structural rhythm in crops is unclear. Here, we aim to explore the seasonal and circadian rhythms in maize structural traits at both the plant and leaf levels from time-series TLS. The seasonal rhythm was studied using TLS data collected at four key growth periods, including jointing, bell-mouthed, heading, and maturity periods. Circadian rhythms were explored by using TLS data acquired around every 2 hours in a whole day under standard and cold stress conditions. Results showed that TLS can quantify the seasonal and circadian rhythm in structural traits at both plant and leaf levels. (1) Leaf inclination angle decreased significantly between the jointing stage and bell-mouthed stage. Leaf azimuth was stable after the jointing stage. (2) Some individual-level structural rhythms (e.g., azimuth and projected leaf area/PLA) were consistent with leaf-level structural rhythms. (3) The circadian rhythms of some traits (e.g., PLA) were not consistent under standard and cold stress conditions. (4) Environmental factors showed better correlations with leaf traits under cold stress than standard conditions. Temperature was the most important factor that significantly correlated with all leaf traits except leaf azimuth. This study highlights the potential of time-series TLS in studying outdoor agricultural chronobiology.

Identifiers

PMID34557676
PMCPMC8441379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.