Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557674›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2019

Learning from Few Subjects with Large Amounts of Voice Monitoring Data.

Jose Javier Gonzalez Ortiz, Daryush Mehta, Jarrad Van Stan, Robert Hillman, John V Guttag, Marzyeh Ghassemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jose Javier Gonzalez OrtizComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, MIT.
Daryush MehtaCenter for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, MGH.
Jarrad Van StanCenter for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, MGH.
Robert HillmanCenter for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, MGH.
John V GuttagComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, MIT.
Marzyeh GhassemiUniversity of Toronto, Vector Institute.

Funding

Use of ambulatory biofeedback to improve behavioral treatment of vocal hyperfunctionP50DC015446 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Matias Zanartu · 2017 to 2026
$25.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC015446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, researchers have started training high complexity machine learning models to clinical tasks, often improving upon previous benchmarks. However, more often than not, these methods require large amounts of supervision to provide good generalization guarantees. When applied to data coming from small cohorts and long monitoring periods these models are prone to overfit to subject-identifying features. Since obtaining large amounts of labels is usually not practical in many scenarios, expert-driven knowledge of the task is a common technique to prevent overfitting. We present a two-step learning approach that is able to generalize under these circumstances when applied to a voice monitoring dataset. Our approach decouples the feature learning stage and performs it in an unsupervised manner, removing the need for laborious feature engineering. We show the effectiveness of our proposed model on two voice monitoring related tasks. We evaluate the extracted features for classifying between patients with vocal fold nodules and controls. We also demonstrate that the features capture pathology relevant information by showing that models trained on them are more accurate predicting vocal use for patients than for controls. Our proposed method is able to generalize to unseen subjects and across learning tasks while matching state-of-the-art results.

Identifiers

PMID34557674
PMCPMC8456782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.