ArticleTransplantation direct2021
Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial of Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine A Microemulsion in Children Post Liver Transplantation.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (Tac) and cyclosporine immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation (LTx).
methodsOne hundred fifty-six patients who had taken part in a multicenter, randomized, open, parallel study of Tac and corticosteroids versus cyclosporine A microemulsion (CyA-ME), corticosteroids, and azathioprine. Patients were assessed at regular intervals up to 14 y after LTx. Analysis was conducted descriptively.
resultsIn a long-term follow-up, there was a similar incidence of acute rejection (Tac versus CyA-ME, 5 versus 8) and graft loss (5 versus 10). There were 11 deaths in the cohort, which were from infectious complications/malignancy in the Tac group (n = 2/5) and from chronic rejection/liver failure in the CyA-ME group (n = 3/6). A similar incidence of Epstein-Barr virus and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease was observed (8 versus 8, 3 versus 3). However, there was a greater incidence of cosmetic adverse events in the CyA-ME cohort, with higher incidences of hypertrichosis (8 versus 27) and gum hyperplasia (20 versus 6). Growth improved equally in both groups. Overall, 81% of patients randomized to Tac remained on Tac therapy at study end, compared with 31% of patients randomized to CyA-ME. Common reasons for switching from CyA-ME included steroid-resistant/acute rejection (n = 12/8) and cosmetic changes (n = 8).
conclusionsThis study is the first prospective, observational follow-up study of pediatric patients randomized to Tac and CyA-ME to evaluate long-term outcomes. Our analysis was limited by the degree of switchover between the cohorts; however, there were fewer deaths from chronic rejection/liver failure and reduced adverse events with Tac. Long-term use of Tac and Tac combination therapy appears to be safe and effective immunosuppression for pediatric LTx recipients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.