Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557416›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Chemoradiotherapy Is Superior to Radiotherapy Alone in Esophageal Cancer Patients Older Than 65 Years: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the SEER Database.

Xiaojie Xia, Qing Gao, Xiaolin Ge, Zeyuan Liu, Xiaoke Di, Xinchen Sun, Yan Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Management of esogastric cancer in older patients.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaojie XiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Qing GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Xiaolin GeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Zeyuan LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Xiaoke DiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Xinchen SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Yan YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadiotherapy (RT) is the main treatment for unoperated esophageal cancer (EC) patients. It is controversial whether adding chemotherapy (CT) to RT is beneficial for elderly EC patients. The purpose of our study was to compare the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with RT alone for non-surgical elderly esophageal cancer patients.

methodsA total of 7,101 eligible EC patients older than 65 years diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All the samples were divided into the radiotherapy group and the chemoradiotherapy group. After being matched by propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio, 3,020 patients were included in our analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were applied to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

resultsAfter PSM, the clinical characteristics of patients between the RT and CRT groups were comparable. For EC patients older than 65 years, the 3-year OS and CSS in the CRT group were 21.8% and 27.4%, and the 5-year OS and CSS in the CRT group were 12.7% and 19.8%, respectively. The 3-year OS and CSS in the RT group were 6.4% and 10.4%, and the 5-year OS and CSS in the RT group were 3.5% and 7.2%, respectively. Next, these patients were divided into five subgroups based on the age stratification (ages 65-69; 70-74; 75-79; 80-84; ≥85). In each subgroup analysis, the 3- and 5-year OS and CSS showed significant benefits in the CRT group rather than in the RT group (all p < 0.05). We were unable to assess toxicities between the two groups due to a lack of correlated information.

conclusionsCRT could improve OS and CSS for non-surgical EC patients older than 65 years. Adding chemotherapy to radiation showed a significant prognostic advantage for elderly esophageal cancer patients.

Indexed as

chemoradiationelderly patientsesophageal cancerSEERsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID34557416
PMCPMC8453162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.