ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Clinical and Radiological Features of Urachal Carcinoma and Infection.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Urachal calculus with an atypical intravesical CT appearance and literature review.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Robot‑assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy for urachal carcinoma: A case report.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Multiple Complications of Crohn's Disease and the Need for Early and Continuous Multidisciplinary Undertaking.Journal of medical cases · 2023Article
- Low-Grade Urachal Cystadenoma With Abundant Calcification Removed Using Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2023Article
- Preoperative accuracy of diagnostic evaluation of urachal carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Urachal Carcinoma, An Unusual Possibility of Hematuria; Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Single-Port Robot assisted partial cystectomy for urachal adenocarcinoma.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo explore the clinical and radiological differences between urachal carcinoma and urachal infection.
methodsClinical and imaging information for 13 cases of urachal carcinoma and 14 cases of urachal infection confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed. The size, location, shape, margin, lesion composition, calcification, T1 and T2 signal intensity, peripheral lymph nodes, degree of enhancement, adjacent bladder wall, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value were examined in both groups, and distinguish features were determined. The student
resultsSex, hematuria, abdominal pain, calcification, and thickening of adjacent bladder wall can distinguish between urachal carcinoma and urachal infection (
conclusionThe following clinical and imaging features help distinguish urachal carcinoma from urachal infection: sex, hematuria, abdominal pain, calcification, and thickening of the adjacent bladder wall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.