Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557384›Full record

ArticleUrology case reports2021

Urethral self-insertion of a USB cable as sexual experimentation: A case report.

Ioannis Loufopoulos, Konstantinos Kapriniotis, Clio Kennedy, Sabareen Huq, Thomas Reid, Ashwin Sridhar

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Urology case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ioannis LoufopoulosUniversity College Hospital at Westmoreland Street, London, United Kingdom.
Konstantinos KapriniotisUniversity College Hospital at Westmoreland Street, London, United Kingdom.
Clio KennedyUniversity College Hospital at Westmoreland Street, London, United Kingdom.
Sabareen HuqUniversity College Hospital at Westmoreland Street, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas ReidUniversity College Hospital at Westmoreland Street, London, United Kingdom.
Ashwin SridharUniversity College Hospital at Westmoreland Street, London, United Kingdom.
University College Hospital at Westmoreland Street · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The insertion of a foreign body into the urethra is a delicate matter that may prevent patients from presenting promptly. It can have serious long-term implications. Sexual experimentation and gratification, as well as underlying mental disorders, are considered the main causes of retained foreign bodies in the urethra and bladder. Management varies depending on the shape and size of the object, and the mechanism of insertion. Here we describe the case of a 15-year-old boy who self-inserted a USB wire into his proximal urethra. Manual and endoscopic attempts at removal were unsuccessful. A peno-scrotal urethrostomy was performed.

Indexed as

AutoerotismForeign bodySelf-insertionUrethra

Identifiers

PMID34557384
PMCPMC8445838
OpenAlexW3201065848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.