ArticleCell medicine2019
Cryopreserved Alginate-Encapsulated Islets Can Restore Euglycemia in a Diabetic Animal Model Better than Cryopreserved Non-encapsulated Islets.
Article in Cell medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scaling Insulin-Producing Cells by Multiple Strategies.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Review
- Freezing biological organisms for biomedical applications.Smart medicine · 2022Review
- Natural Biopolymers as Additional Tools for Cell Microencapsulation Applied to Cellular Therapy.Polymers · 2022Review
- In vitro generation of transplantable insulin-producing cells from canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Alginate/Pluronic F127-based encapsulation supports viability and functionality of human dental pulp stem cell-derived insulin-producing cells.Journal of biological engineering · 2020Article
- Cryopreservation: An Overview of Principles and Cell-Specific Considerations.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Islet transplantation has been shown to restore normoglycemia clinically. One of the current limitations to the widespread clinical use of islet transplantation is culturing and preserving more than 1 million islet equivalents in preparation for transplant. One possible solution is to bank frozen islets and use them when needed. Although promising, the standard islet freezing protocol introduces stress and cell death, resulting in high variability of islet quality post thawing. This study aimed to develop an improved cryopreservation protocol using alginate-encapsulated islets to improve islet survival and function for future transplants. Our data showed that encapsulation improved islet survival and function after thawing the frozen islets. Frozen encapsulated islets have an islet yield recovery of 84% when compared to non-encapsulated islets at 72% after thawing. Post-thaw viability was 78% for non-encapsulated islets compared to 88% for encapsulated islets. The stimulation index values after a static glucose test following thawing were 1.9 ± 0.5, 2.9 ± 0.1, and 3.3 ± 0.3 for the non-encapsulated, 1.75% alginate, and 2.5% alginate groups, respectively. In a transplant study, the mice that received 1.75% alginate-encapsulated cryopreserved islets achieved normoglycemia on average 5 days after transplant. In comparison, control mice that received fresh islets took 4 days, while those receiving unencapsulated cryopreserved islets took 18 days. In conclusion, encapsulating islets in 1.75% alginate prior to freezing was shown to improve islet survival, function post thawing, and graft response significantly when compared to islets frozen without encapsulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.