Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557231›Full record

ReviewStem cells international2021

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Degenerative Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Baocheng Xie, Shichun Chen, Yongxiang Xu, Weichao Han, Runkai Hu, Minyi Chen, Ruirong He, Shaobo Ding

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Baocheng XieDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-402X
Shichun ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5046-1601
Yongxiang XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4546-0604
Weichao HanDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-9891
Runkai HuDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-2226
Minyi ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6699-6443
Ruirong HeDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0980-3665
Shaobo DingDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4410-8641
Southern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) can cause severe low back pain, which will have a serious negative impact on the ability to perform daily tasks or activities. For the past few years, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation has emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of DDD. However, the clinical efficacy of MSC in the treatment of DDD still lacks clinical evidence and is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of MSC transplantation in patients with DDD. We searched major databases using terms from the database's inception through March 2021. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess quality. The analysis showed that MSC therapy could decrease visual analog scale (VAS) scores (SMD = -0.50, 95%CI = -0.68 ~ -0.33,

Identifiers

PMID34557231
PMCPMC8455197
OpenAlexW3201635712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.