Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557124›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Psychological Burden During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany.

Iris Schelhorn, Angelika Ecker, Michael Noah Lüdtke, Stefan Rehm, Thomy Tran, Judith Lena Bereznai, Marie Lisa Meyer, Stefan Sütterlin, Max Kinateder, Ricardo Gregorio Lugo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Resilient or Vulnerable? Effects of the COVID-19 Crisis on the Mental Health of Refugees in Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Iris SchelhornDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Angelika EckerClinic and Polyclinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael Noah LüdtkeDepartment of Psychology, Private University of Applied Sciences, Göttingen, Germany.
Stefan RehmDepartment of Psychology, Private University of Applied Sciences, Göttingen, Germany.
Thomy TranDepartment of Psychology, Private University of Applied Sciences, Göttingen, Germany.
Judith Lena BereznaiDepartment of Psychology, Private University of Applied Sciences, Göttingen, Germany.
Marie Lisa MeyerDepartment of Psychology, Private University of Applied Sciences, Göttingen, Germany.
Stefan SütterlinFaculty of Health and Welfare Sciences, Østfold University College, Fredrikstad, Norway.
Max KinatederNational Research Council Canada (NRC-CNRC), Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ricardo Gregorio LugoFaculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway.
Youssef ShibanDepartment of Psychology, Private University of Applied Sciences, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the first COVID-19 case was diagnosed in Germany, various measures limiting contact between people were introduced across the country. The implementation of these measures varied between jurisdictions and potentially had a negative impact on the psychological well-being of many people. However, the prevalence, severity, and type of symptoms of psychological burden has not been documented in detail. In the current study, we analysed various self-reported symptoms of psychological burden in a German sample. The dataset was collected between April 8th and June 1st, 2020, through an online survey measuring psychological burden using the ICD-10-symptom rating scale. More than 2,000 individuals responded to the survey, with a total of 1,459 complete datasets. Data was then sampled to compare (1) the new data to an existing demographically comparable reference dataset including a total of 2,512 participants who did not undergo any kind of contact restrictions or other pandemic measurements, and (2) psychological burden in two different German states. In line with recent observations from Germany, Italy, China, Austria and Turkey, we found a high prevalence of depressive symptoms in comparison to the reference sample. Furthermore, we found a high prevalence of eating disorder and compulsion symptoms. Especially younger adults and women reported a higher symptom severity compared to other groups during our measurement period. However, no difference between the two states in psychological burden was found.

Indexed as

COVID-19depressionGermanymental healthpsychological burden

Identifiers

PMID34557124
PMCPMC8453152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.