Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557046›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021

Pitfalls of Advanced Retinopathy of Prematurity Presentation: A Content Analysis of Medical Records.

Lojain AlBathi, Noura Abouammoh, Nayef AlSwaina, Hani B AlBalawi, Abdullah A Al Qahtani, Mohammed Talea, Sulaiman M AlSulaiman, Marwan A Abouammoh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Saudi Arabian retinopathy of prematurity national telemedicine program: Achievements and challenges.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lojain AlBathiDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Noura AbouammohDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nayef AlSwainaDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.
Hani B AlBalawiDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Tabuk University, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah A Al QahtaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed TaleaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asir Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Sulaiman M AlSulaimanKing Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Vitreoretinal and Uveitis Divisions, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Marwan A AbouammohDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0020-8069
King Saud University · SAAsir Central Hospital · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital · SAQassim University · SAUniversity of Tabuk · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify the pitfalls in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening leading to advanced disease at Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

methodsA qualitative deductive content analysis was used to study the phenomena of defects in ROP screening. A retrospective review of medical records of newborns presenting to two tertiary eye care centers with advanced ROP (stage 4 and 5) from January 2012 to June 2019 was completed. An extensive review of the original files at the referring hospitals was conducted, including the general condition and findings of ophthalmic examination and the sequence of follow-up until the infant was discharged/referred. Data analysis was completed using pre-structured categorization matrix.

resultsRecords of 29 infants with advanced stage ROP were identified. Only 13 medical records were available and obtained. The pitfalls in screening found in the study were failure to refer by the neonatologist, delayed follow-up by the ophthalmologist, failure to follow-up by the ophthalmologist, failure to diagnose by the ophthalmologist, poor documentation in patient files, unavailability of ophthalmologist, family negligence, lack of treatment and delayed referral to a higher center, and progression despite timely screening and management.

conclusionAlthough clear ROP screening guidelines are available, implementations of these guidelines are suboptimal. This study showed that the most common defect in screening is physician's inadequacy and unavailability. A proper network of competent ROP screening physicians in all neonatal intensive care units should be established. Centers for advanced ROP surgery should be allocated to deliver a timely surgical care if needed.

Indexed as

content analysispitfallsretinopathy of prematurity screening

Identifiers

PMID34557046
PMCPMC8453427
OpenAlexW3201317821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.