ArticleJournal of inflammation research2021
Relationship Between the Eosinophil/Monocyte Ratio and Prognosis in Decompensated Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- The Impact of the Histologic Types of Lung Cancer on CBC-Derived Inflammatory Markers-Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Association between blood eosinophil levels and prognosis in critically ill patients with different heart failure phenotypes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Peripheral Eosinophil Count Is Associated With the Prognosis of Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- The Predictive Value of Eosinophil Indices for Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute Decompensated HFrEF.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Bioinformatics and systems biology approaches to identify molecular targeting mechanism influenced by COVID-19 on heart failure.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the value of the eosinophil/monocyte ratio (EMR) for predicting the prognosis of decompensated heart failure (HF). PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study. We included adults (≥18 years old) diagnosed with decompensated HF for whom EMR data were available. The patients were divided into three groups according to EMR tertiles (T1 [EMR≤0.15], T2 [0.15<EMR≤0.32], and T3 [EMR>0.32]). The primary endpoint was the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization.
resultsInitially, the records of 2264 patients with decompensated HF were screened; 1883 of these patients had EMR data and were therefore included in the study. There were 627 patients in the T1 group, 628 in the T2 group, and 628 in the T3 group. The risk of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization was significantly different among the three groups (Log rank test, P=0.007). Compared with the T3 group, both the T1 group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.94, P=0.002) and the T2 group (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.03-1.74, P=0.030) had significantly higher rates of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization. A Cochran-Armitage test for trend showed a positive correlation between the EMR and the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF. There was a significant difference between the three groups in terms of cardiovascular death (Log rank test, P<0.001) and HF rehospitalization (Log rank test, P=0.03).
conclusionThe EMR is positively correlated with the risk of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization in patients with decompensated HF. Specifically, the lower the EMR, the higher the risk of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.