Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34556813›Full record

ReviewOncogene2021

Phenotypic plasticity of myeloid cells in glioblastoma development, progression, and therapeutics.

Zengpanpan Ye, Xiaolin Ai, Linjie Zhao, Fan Fei, Ping Wang, Shengtao Zhou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Glioblastoma Stem Cells-Useful Tools in the Battle against Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zengpanpan Ye *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, West China Second Hospital and Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
Xiaolin Ai *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, West China Second Hospital and Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P. R. China.
Linjie ZhaoDivision of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-2873
Fan FeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital; School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.32 West Second Section First Ring Road, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China. 917597029@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4437-3186
Ping WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, West China Second Hospital and Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P. R. China. wangping_886@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2429-5918
Shengtao ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, West China Second Hospital and Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P. R. China. taotaovip2005@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8322-5536
Sichuan University · CNUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and malignant type of intracranial tumors with poor prognosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that phenotypic alterations of infiltrating myeloid cells in the tumor microenvironment are important for GBM progression. Conventional tumor immunotherapy commonly targets T-cells, while innate immunity as a therapeutic target is an emerging field. Targeting infiltrating myeloid cells that induce immune suppression in the TME provides a novel direction to improve the prognosis of patients with GBM. The factors released by tumor cells recruit myeloid cells into tumor bed and reprogram infiltrating myeloid cells into immunostimulatory/immunosuppressive phenotypes. Reciprocally, infiltrating myeloid cells, especially microglia/macrophages, regulate GBM progression and affect therapeutic efficacy. Herein, we revisited biological characteristics and functions of infiltrating myeloid cells and discussed the recent advances in immunotherapies targeting infiltrating myeloid cells in GBM. With an evolving understanding of the complex interactions between infiltrating myeloid cells and tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment, we will expand novel immunotherapeutic regimens targeting infiltrating myeloid cells in GBM treatment and improve the outcomes of GBM patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionGlioblastomaHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunity, InnateImmunotherapyMyeloid CellsPhenotypePrognosisTumor MicroenvironmentImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34556813
OpenAlexW3200778995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.