Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34556787›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Attractiveness of female sexual signaling predicts differences in female grouping patterns between bonobos and chimpanzees.

Martin Surbeck, Cédric Girard-Buttoz, Liran Samuni, Christophe Boesch, Barbara Fruth, Catherine Crockford, Roman M Wittig, Gottfried Hohmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reproductive inequality among males in the genusPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Weak, but not strong, ties support coalition formation among wild female chimpanzees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin Surbeck *Harvard University, Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge, MA, USA. msurbeck@fas.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-2927
Cédric Girard-Buttoz *Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. cedric.buttoz@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1742-4400
Liran SamuniHarvard University, Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Christophe BoeschMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9538-7858
Barbara FruthFaculty of Science, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-3053
Catherine CrockfordMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Roman M WittigMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6490-4031
Gottfried HohmannMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we show that sexual signaling affects patterns of female spatial association differently in chimpanzees and bonobos, indicating its relevance in shaping the respective social systems. Generally, spatial association between females often mirrors patterns and strength of social relationships and cooperation within groups. While testing for proposed differences in female-female associations underlying female coalition formation in the species of the genus Pan, we find only limited evidence for a higher female-female gregariousness in bonobos. While bonobo females exhibited a slightly higher average number of females in their parties, there is neither a species difference in the time females spent alone, nor in the number of female party members in the absence of sexually attractive females. We find that the more frequent presence of maximally tumescent females in bonobos is associated with a significantly stronger increase in the number of female party members, independent of variation in a behavioural proxy for food abundance. This indicates the need to look beyond ecology when explaining species differences in female sociality as it refutes the idea that the higher gregariousness among bonobo females is driven by ecological factors alone and highlights that the temporal distribution of female sexual receptivity is an important factor to consider when studying mammalian sociality.

Indexed as

Mating Preference, AnimalSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemalePan paniscusPan troglodytes

Identifiers

PMID34556787
PMCPMC8460808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.