Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34556763›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Galvanic current dosage and bacterial concentration are determinants of the bactericidal effect of percutaneous needle electrolysis: an in vitro study.

José Antonio García-Vidal, Jesús Salinas, Pilar Escolar-Reina, Francisco Cuello, Nieves Ortega, Juan de Dios Berná-Mestre, Manuel López-Nicolás, Fermín Valera-Garrido, Francesc Medina-Mirapeix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

José Antonio García-VidalDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain. garciavidal@um.es.
Jesús SalinasDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Pilar Escolar-ReinaDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain. pescolar@um.es.
Francisco CuelloDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Nieves OrtegaDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Juan de Dios Berná-MestreDepartment of Radiology, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital, El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain.
Manuel López-NicolásDepartment of Dermatology, Stomatology, Radiology and Physical Medicine, University of Murcia, 30008, Murcia, Spain.
Fermín Valera-GarridoMVClinic Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Francesc Medina-MirapeixDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) is a physiotherapy technique that has been shown to be effective in different pathologies such as tendinopathies or mammary fistula. For many years, theoretical bactericidal and germicidal effects have been attributed to this type of galvanic currents, partly explained by the changes in pH that it generates. However, these effects have not yet been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bactericidal effect and the changes in pH caused by PNE. S. aureus were prepared in two different solutions (TSB and saline solution) and in different concentrations (from 9 to 6 Log

Indexed as

ElectrolysisHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationNeedlesStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID34556763
PMCPMC8460800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.