Observational studyScientific reports2021
Patient preferences in retinal drug delivery.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and characterization of a topical ferrochelatase inhibitor nanoemulsion for choroidal neovascularization therapy.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Patient and Physician Perspectives on Oral Treatment in Ophthalmology.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- The impact of herbal medicine development on the population health in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- US Patients' Preferences for Geographic Atrophy Treatment.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- US Retina Specialists' Preferences for Geographic Atrophy Treatment.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Patient and Physician Perspectives on the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Ref-1 redox activity regulates retinal neovascularization by modulating transcriptional activation of HIF-1α.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
- Ref-1 is overexpressed in neovascular eye disease and targetable with a novel inhibitor.Angiogenesis · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives on Handling Single-Dose versus Multi-Dose Eye Drops: A Cross-Over Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities of developing small-molecule therapies for age-related macular degeneration.Archives of pharmacal research · 2024Review
- A bioengineered anti-VEGF protein with high affinity and high concentration for intravitreal treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Article
- Beyond VEGF: Targeting Inflammation and Other Pathways for Treatment of Retinal Disease.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2023Review
- Identification of Novel Pathways Regulated by APE1/Ref-1 in Human Retinal Endothelial Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Topical and Subconjunctival Injection of Hyaluronic Acid-Coated Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery to Posterior Eye.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Inhibition of APE1/Ref-1 for Neovascular Eye Diseases: From Biology to Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal vascular diseases (RVDs) are often treated with intravitreally (IVT) injected drugs, with relatively low patient compliance and potential risks. Ongoing research explores alternative RVD treatments, including eye drops and oral tablets. This study surveyed RVD patients treated with IVT injections to establish factors influencing low compliance rates while gauging treatment delivery method preferences. Demographics, perspectives, and treatment preferences were collected via IRB-approved, self-administered survey sent to Glick Eye Institute patients treated via IVT injections. Demographics, diagnoses, and treatments were ascertained from respondents' medical records. Gender, age, and number of IVT injections received were used as stratifications. Five-level Likert-style scales and t-tests evaluated responses and stratification comparisons. The most common diagnoses in the respondent population (n = 54; response rate = 5%) were age-related macular degeneration, macular edema, and diabetic retinopathy. Respondents had varying levels of education, income, and age. Most (83%) admitted feeling anxious prior to their first IVT injection, but 80% reported willingness to receive IVT injections indefinitely, with a preference for ophthalmologist visits every 1-3 months. Eye drops would be preferred over IVT injections by 76% of respondents, while 65% preferred oral tablets, due to several perceived negative factors of IVT injections and positive factors for eye drops. Stratified groups did not differ in responses to survey questions. RVD patients will accept IVT injections for vision preservation, but alternative delivery methods like eye drops or oral tablets would be preferred. Thus, development of eye drop and oral therapeutics for RVD treatment is further emphasized by these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.