Observational studyScientific reports2021
Atrial high-rate episodes predict major adverse cardio/cerebrovascular events in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors for Device-Detected Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: An Up-to-Date Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Short-term effect of low atrial septum pacing on new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus node dysfunction a prospective randomized single-center study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Article
- How should I treat patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation and atrial high-rate episodes? Current evidence and clinical importance.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) have a high risk of neurologic events, although the causal role and optimal cutoff threshold of AHRE for major adverse cardio/cerebrovascular events (MACCE) are unknown. This study aimed to identify independent factors for AHRE and subsequent atrial fibrillation (AF) after documented AHRE. We enrolled 470 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) implantations. The primary endpoint was subsequent MACCE after AHRE ≥ 6 min, 6 h, and 24 h. AHRE was defined as > 175 beats per minute (bpm) (Medtronic®) or > 200 bpm (Biotronik®) lasting ≥ 30 s. Multivariate Cox regression analysis with time-dependent covariates was used to determine variables associated with independent risk of MACCE. The patients' median age was 76 year, and 126 patients (26.8%) developed AHRE ≥ 6 min, 63 (13.4%) ≥ 6 h, and 39 (8.3%) ≥ 24 h. During follow-up (median: 29 months), 142 MACCE occurred in 123 patients. Optimal AHRE cutoff value was 6 min, with highest Youden index for MACCE. AHRE ≥ 6 min ~ 24 h was independently associated with MACCE and predicted subsequent AF. Male gender, lower body mass index, or BMI, and left atrial diameter were independently associated with AHRE ≥ 6 min ~ 24 h. Patients with CIEDs who develop AHRE ≥ 6 min have an independently increased risk of MACCE. Comprehensive assessment of patients with CIEDs is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.