Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34556682›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Risk prediction of clinical adverse outcomes with machine learning in a cohort of critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation.

Lorenzo Falsetti, Matteo Rucco, Marco Proietti, Giovanna Viticchi, Vincenzo Zaccone, Mattia Scarponi, Laura Giovenali, Gianluca Moroncini, Cinzia Nitti, Aldo Salvi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lorenzo Falsetti *Internal and Sub-Intensive Medicine Department, A.O.U. "Ospedali Riuniti" di Ancona, Via Conca 10, 60126, Ancona, Italy. drfalsetti@yahoo.it.
Matteo Rucco *Cyber-Physical Department, United Technology Research Center, Trento, Italy.
Marco ProiettiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna ViticchiNeurological Clinic Department, A.O.U. "Ospedali Riuniti", Ancona, Italy.
Vincenzo ZacconeInternal and Sub-Intensive Medicine Department, A.O.U. "Ospedali Riuniti" di Ancona, Via Conca 10, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
Mattia ScarponiEmergency Medicine Residency Program, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Laura GiovenaliEmergency Medicine Residency Program, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Gianluca MoronciniClinica Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti", Ancona, Italy.
Cinzia NittiInternal and Sub-Intensive Medicine Department, A.O.U. "Ospedali Riuniti" di Ancona, Via Conca 10, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
Aldo SalviInternal and Sub-Intensive Medicine Department, A.O.U. "Ospedali Riuniti" di Ancona, Via Conca 10, 60126, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critically ill patients affected by atrial fibrillation are at high risk of adverse events: however, the actual risk stratification models for haemorrhagic and thrombotic events are not validated in a critical care setting. With this paper we aimed to identify, adopting topological data analysis, the risk factors for therapeutic failure (in-hospital death or intensive care unit transfer), the in-hospital occurrence of stroke/TIA and major bleeding in a cohort of critically ill patients with pre-existing atrial fibrillation admitted to a stepdown unit; to engineer newer prediction models based on machine learning in the same cohort. We selected all medical patients admitted for critical illness and a history of pre-existing atrial fibrillation in the timeframe 01/01/2002-03/08/2007. All data regarding patients' medical history, comorbidities, drugs adopted, vital parameters and outcomes (therapeutic failure, stroke/TIA and major bleeding) were acquired from electronic medical records. Risk factors for each outcome were analyzed adopting topological data analysis. Machine learning was used to generate three different predictive models. We were able to identify specific risk factors and to engineer dedicated clinical prediction models for therapeutic failure (AUC: 0.974, 95%CI: 0.934-0.975), stroke/TIA (AUC: 0.931, 95%CI: 0.896-0.940; Brier score: 0.13) and major bleeding (AUC: 0.930:0.911-0.939; Brier score: 0.09) in critically-ill patients, which were able to predict accurately their respective clinical outcomes. Topological data analysis and machine learning techniques represent a concrete viewpoint for the physician to predict the risk at the patients' level, aiding the selection of the best therapeutic strategy in critically ill patients affected by pre-existing atrial fibrillation.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAtrial FibrillationCritical IllnessFemaleHemorrhageHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsIschemic Attack, TransientMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStroke

Identifiers

PMID34556682
PMCPMC8460701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.