Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34556516›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2021

Nature versus urban hiking for Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder: a pilot randomised trial conducted in the Pacific Northwest USA.

Alyson J Littman, Gregory N Bratman, Keren Lehavot, Charles C Engel, John C Fortney, Alexander Peterson, Alex Jones, Carolyn Klassen, Joshua Brandon, Howard Frumkin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03997344 (Veterans Nature Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03997344 nacompletednot on this map

Veterans Nature Therapy: A Pilot Randomized Trial of Hiking for Veterans With PTSD

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2019 to 2020Enrolled26ConditionsPosttraumatic Stress DisordersArmsGroup nature hikes, Group urban hikes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alyson J LittmanSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA Alyson@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4247-8286
Gregory N BratmanSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5982-4686
Keren LehavotSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Charles C EngelSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9232-3389
John C FortneySeattle-Denver Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alexander PetersonSeattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1697-4259
Alex JonesOutdoors for All, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Carolyn KlassenSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joshua BrandonSpirit of America, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Howard FrumkinDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate feasibility and acceptability of a group-based nature recreation intervention (nature hiking) and control condition (urban hiking) for military Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). DESIGN AND

settingA pilot randomised controlled trial conducted in the US Pacific Northwest.

participantsVeterans with PTSD due to any cause.

interventionsTwenty-six participants were randomised to a 12-week intervention involving either six nature hikes (n=13) or six urban hikes (n=13). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was assessed based on recruitment, retention and attendance. Questionnaires and postintervention qualitative interviews were conducted to explore intervention acceptability. Questionnaires assessing acceptability and outcomes planned for the future trial (eg, PTSD symptoms) were collected at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks (immediately after the final hike) and 24 weeks follow-up.

resultsOf 415 people assessed for eligibility/interest, 97 were interested and passed preliminary eligibility screening, and 26 were randomised. Mean completion of all questionnaires was 91% among those in the nature hiking group and 68% in those in the urban hiking group. Over the course of the intervention, participants in the nature and urban groups attended an average of 56% and 58%, respectively, of scheduled hikes. Acceptability of both urban and nature hikes was high; over 70% reported a positive rating (ie, good/excellent) for the study communication, as well as hike locations, distance and pace. Median PTSD symptom scores (PTSD Checklist-5) improved more at 12 weeks and 24 weeks among those in the nature versus urban hiking group.

conclusionsThis pilot study largely confirmed the feasibility and acceptability of nature hiking as a potential treatment for Veterans with PTSD. Adaptations will be needed to improve recruitment and increase hike attendance for a future randomised controlled trial to effectively test and isolate the ways in which nature contact, physical activity and social support conferred by the group impact outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03997344.

Indexed as

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVeteransFeasibility StudiesHumansPilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnairesadult psychiatrycomplementary medicinepublic healthtrauma management

Identifiers

PMID34556516
PMCPMC8461737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.