Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34556477›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021

Quantitative Analysis of the Olfactory System in COVID-19: An MR Imaging Study.

E Altunisik, A H Baykan, S Sahin, E Aydin, S M Erturk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E AltunisikFrom the Department of Neurology (E. Altunisik).ORCID 0000-0002-5996-2090
A H BaykanRadiology (A.H.B.), Adiyaman University Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman, Turkey drbaykan@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9281-652X
S SahinDepartment of Radiology (S.S.), Adiyaman Training and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6920-4317
E AydinDepartment of Radiology (E. Aydin), Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0907-3647
S M ErturkDepartment of Radiology (S.M.E), Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4086-675X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAnosmia or hyposmia, often accompanied by changes in taste, is recognized as a common symptom that can assist in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The pathogenesis of olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 is not yet fully understood. MR imaging represents a useful anatomic imaging method for the evaluation of olfactory dysfunction associated with varying etiologies, including viral infection, trauma, and neurodegenerative processes. This case-control study was conducted to compare quantitative measurements of olfactory anatomic structures between patients diagnosed with COVID-19 associated with persistent olfactory dysfunction and healthy controls. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study has a retrospective design. Cranial MR imaging was performed on all participants in both the patient and control groups. The bilateral olfactory bulb volume, olfactory tract length, and olfactory sulcus depth were measured in all patients.

resultsA total of 116 people aged 18-60 years, including 36 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and 80 controls, were included in the study. All measured values were compared between the patient and control groups. The right, left, and total olfactory bulb volume values were significantly lower in the patient group than in the control group. The patient group also had significantly lower right and left olfactory sulcus depth and olfactory tract length values compared with those in the control group.

conclusionsMR imaging findings can be used to demonstrate olfactory injury in patients with COVID-19. The olfactory pathway may represent an alternative route for virus entry into the central nervous system.

Indexed as

COVID-19Case-Control StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34556477
PMCPMC8805742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.