Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34556163›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

The Great Belt train accident: the emergency medical services response.

Peter Martin Hansen, Søren Bruun Jepsen, Søren Mikkelsen, Marius Rehn

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cross-border collaboration in a major incident: emergency medical services response to a train crash.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Concrete silo collapse: emergency medical services response to a mass casualty incident.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The Field's mass shooting: emergency medical services response.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter Martin HansenThe Mobile Emergency Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Odense University Hospital Svendborg, Baagøes Allé 31, 5700, Svendborg, Denmark. peter.martin.hansen@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8065-5765
Søren Bruun JepsenThe Mobile Emergency Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Søren MikkelsenThe Mobile Emergency Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Marius RehnDepartment of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Postboks 414 Sentrum, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor incidents (MI) are rare occurrences in Scandinavia. Literature depicting Scandinavian MI management is scarce and case reports and research is called for. In 2019, a trailer falling off a freight train struck a passing high-speed train on the Great Belt Bridge in Denmark, killing eight people instantly and injuring fifteen people. We aim to describe the emergency medical services (EMS) response to this MI and evaluate adherence to guidelines to identify areas of improvement for future MI management. CASE PRESENTATION: Nineteen EMS units were dispatched to the incident site. Ambulances transported fifteen patients to a trauma centre after evacuation. Deceased patients were pronounced life-extinct on-scene. Radio communication was partly compromised, since 38.9% of the radio shifts were not according to the planned radio grid and presented a potential threat to patient outcome and personnel safety. Access to the incident site was challenging and delayed due to traffic congestion and safety issues.

conclusionDespite harsh weather conditions and complex logistics, the availability of EMS units was sufficient and patient treatment and evacuation was uncomplicated. Triage was relevant, but at the physicians' discretion. Important findings were communication challenges and the consequences of difficult access to the incident site. There is a need for an expansion of capacity in formal education in MI management in Denmark.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesMass Casualty IncidentsAccidentsAmbulancesHumansTriageCommunicationMajor incident managementMass casualty incidents

Identifiers

PMID34556163
PMCPMC8461896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.