Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34555996›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2021

Protective effect of standardised fruit extract of

Prakash Chandra Gupta, Ashish Kar, Nisha Sharma, Prashant Kumar Singh, Naba Kumar Goswami, Satyanshu Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Prakash Chandra GuptaUniversity Institute of Pharmacy, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University, Kanpur, India.
Ashish KarNortheastern Regional Centre, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Guwahati, India.
Nisha SharmaUniversity Institute of Pharmacy, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University, Kanpur, India.
Prashant Kumar SinghUniversity Institute of Pharmacy, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University, Kanpur, India.
Naba Kumar GoswamiNortheastern Regional Centre, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Guwahati, India.
Satyanshu KumarICAR-Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, Boriavi, Anand, India.
Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University · INEnergy and Resources Institute · INDirectorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe fruit of

methodsThe effect of GCE (200 and 400 mg/kg body weight) was evaluated by determining various gastric ulcer parameters like gastric wall mucus, non-protein sulfhydryls (NP-SH) content, microvascular permeability, endogenous antioxidant enzyme, and gastric histopathological study. RESULTS AND

conclusionsOral administration of GCE at doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg exhibited significant (

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Ulcer AgentsEthanolFruitGarciniaHumansMalondialdehydePlant ExtractsRatsRats, WistarStomach UlcerAnti-Ulcer AgentsEthanolMalondialdehydePlant ExtractsantioxidantEthanolGarcinia cowagastric lesionmalondialdehyde

Identifiers

PMID34555996
PMCPMC8475150
OpenAlexW3199128107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.