ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2022
Characterizing and Engineering Biomimetic Materials for Viscoelastic Mechanotransduction Studies.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cellular Responses to Mechanical Cues Across Scales: From Fundamental Insights to Translational Potential.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Mechanobiology-Driven Metabolic Reprogramming: Integrative Roles of YAP/TAZ Signaling and Extracellular Matrix Dynamics.Cell biology international · 2026Review
- Revisiting the biophysical aspects of extracellular-matrix-mimicking hydrogels: what cells seeBiomaterials science · 2025Review
- Mathematical modelling of mechanotransduction via RhoA signalling pathways.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Precision design of dextran-permeated agarose hydrogels matching adipose stem cell adhesion timescales.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Effects of hydrogel stiffness and viscoelasticity on organoid culture: a comprehensive review.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Biomechanical Properties and Cellular Responses in Pulmonary Fibrosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biphasic regulation of epigenetic state by matrix stiffness during cell reprogramming.Science advances · 2024Article
- A sense of proximity: Cell packing modulates oxygen consumption.APL bioengineering · 2023Article
- Effective Governing Equations for Viscoelastic Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advances in Gelatin Bioinks to Optimize Bioprinted Cell Functions.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Review
- Injectable bioorthogonal hydrogel (BIOGEL) accelerates tissue regeneration in degenerated intervertebral discs.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Advanced 3D Models of Human Brain Tissue Using Neural Cell Lines: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects.Cells · 2023Review
- An integratedInternational journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Biogenic polymer-based patches for congenital cardiac surgery: a feasibility study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Transport in the Brain Extracellular Space: Diffusion, but Which Kind?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Impact of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disease on the Biomechanical Properties and Oxidative Stress Metabolism of the Lung Tissue Correlated With the Human Mutant SOD1Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanical behavior of soft tissue extracellular matrix is time dependent. Moreover, it evolves over time due to physiological processes as well as aging and disease. Measuring and quantifying the time-dependent mechanical behavior of soft tissues and materials pose a challenge, not only because of their labile and hydrated nature but also because of the lack of a common definition of terms and understanding of models for characterizing viscoelasticity. Here, we review the most important measurement techniques and models used to determine the viscoelastic properties of soft hydrated materials-or hydrogels-underlining the difference between viscoelastic behavior and the properties and descriptors used to quantify viscoelasticity. We then discuss the principal factors, which determine tissue viscoelasticity
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.