Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34555852›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Fructooligosaccharides: From Breast Milk Components to Potential Supplements. A Systematic Review.

Valentina De Cosmi, Alessandra Mazzocchi, Carlo Agostoni, Francesco Visioli

RetractedOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic ReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Neonatal Microbiome: Is it Still Beneficial?Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Reply to L Bode and SM Donovan.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina De CosmiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra MazzocchiPediatric Intermediate Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Carlo AgostoniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Pediatric Intermediate Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Francesco VisioliDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies (IMDEA)-Food, Campus of International Excellence (CEI) Autonomous University of Madrid + Spanish National Research Council (UAM + CSIC), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: francesco.visioli@unipd.it.
University of Milan · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITMadrid Institute for Advanced Studies · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast milk is the optimal food choice for infant growth and development. Among breast milk components, fructooligosaccharides (FOSs) are being actively studied because of their role in microbiota development. In particular, 2'-fucosyllactose is being proposed as a potential supplement/nutraceutical or component of infant formula. In this systematic review, we critically summarize the available information on FOSs and we discuss their future use in infant nutrition. We searched the main electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus), with a final check in May 2021. Search terms were inserted individually and using the Boolean tools AND and OR. Relevant articles were identified using the following words: ("fructooligosaccharides" OR "FOS") AND ("human milk" OR "breast milk" OR "donor milk" OR "bank milk"). The search retrieved 1814 articles. After removal of duplicates, we screened 1591 articles based on title, abstract, and exclusive use of the English language. We included articles describing the concentration of FOSs in human milk and assessed the relevant ones. We excluded reviews, studies on animals, and studies exclusively carried out on adults. Also, we excluded studies that have not reported evidence either on FOSs or on galactooligosaccharides from human milk. The resulting publications were reviewed, and 10 studies were included in the systematic review. We conclude that human milk FOSs are, indeed, crucial to infant gut development and their addition to infant formula is safe, well-tolerated, and might provide immune benefits to newborns. However, we would like to underscore the scantiness of human data and the need to avoid the immediate translation of infant research to the commercialization of supplements marketed to adults.

Indexed as

Milk, HumanOligosaccharidesAnimalsDietary SupplementsHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenafructooligosaccharideOligosaccharides2′-fucosyllactosebreast milkfructooligosaccharidesinfant developmentmicrobiotasupplements

Identifiers

PMID34555852
PMCPMC8803487
OpenAlexW3200020712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.