SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2022
Fructooligosaccharides: From Breast Milk Components to Potential Supplements. A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Progress on the Degradation of Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOs) by Bifidobacteria.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Yacon powder mix: Effects of the composition and the process of microencapsulation by spray drying.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Neonatal Microbiome: Is it Still Beneficial?Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024Article
- Treatment of preterm brain injury via gut-microbiota-metabolite-brain axis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Review
- Reply to L Bode and SM Donovan.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Fructooligosaccharides are not the same as Fucosylated Human Milk Oligosaccharides.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-11-15Concerns/Issues about Article · Error in Text · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) · · See also: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831322000382 and https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831322000394
- Expression of concern · 2023-02-09Concerns/Issues about Article · Error in Text · Updated to Retraction · · See also: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831322000382 and https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831322000394
- Commented on by
- Expression of concern
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast milk is the optimal food choice for infant growth and development. Among breast milk components, fructooligosaccharides (FOSs) are being actively studied because of their role in microbiota development. In particular, 2'-fucosyllactose is being proposed as a potential supplement/nutraceutical or component of infant formula. In this systematic review, we critically summarize the available information on FOSs and we discuss their future use in infant nutrition. We searched the main electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus), with a final check in May 2021. Search terms were inserted individually and using the Boolean tools AND and OR. Relevant articles were identified using the following words: ("fructooligosaccharides" OR "FOS") AND ("human milk" OR "breast milk" OR "donor milk" OR "bank milk"). The search retrieved 1814 articles. After removal of duplicates, we screened 1591 articles based on title, abstract, and exclusive use of the English language. We included articles describing the concentration of FOSs in human milk and assessed the relevant ones. We excluded reviews, studies on animals, and studies exclusively carried out on adults. Also, we excluded studies that have not reported evidence either on FOSs or on galactooligosaccharides from human milk. The resulting publications were reviewed, and 10 studies were included in the systematic review. We conclude that human milk FOSs are, indeed, crucial to infant gut development and their addition to infant formula is safe, well-tolerated, and might provide immune benefits to newborns. However, we would like to underscore the scantiness of human data and the need to avoid the immediate translation of infant research to the commercialization of supplements marketed to adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.