SynthesisUrologia internationalis2021
Do Various Treatment Modalities of Vesicoureteral Reflux Have Any Adverse Effects in Pediatric Patients? A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Urologia internationalis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a risk factor for various renal problems like recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), pyelonephritis, renal scarring, hypertension, and other renal parenchymal defects. The interventions followed by pediatricians include low-dose antibiotic treatment, surgical correction, and endoscopy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of various primary VUR treatment options. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of journals, and abstracts from conference proceedings were all used to find randomized controlled trials. The articles were retrieved from 1985 till 2020. Twenty articles were used for the data analysis. Criteria for Selection: Surgery, long-term antibiotic prophylaxis, noninvasive techniques, and any mix of therapies are also options for treating VUR. Collection and Interpretation of Data: Two authors searched the literature separately, determining research qualifications, assessing accuracy, and extracting and entering results. The odds ratio (OR) of these studies was used to construct the forest plot. The random-effects model was used to pool the data. Also, the random-effects model was used with statistical significance at a p value < 0.05 to assess the difference in side effects after treatment of VUR using different modalities.
resultsWe found no statistically significant differences between surgery plus antibiotics and antibiotic alone-treated patients in terms of recurrent UTIs (OR = 0.581; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.259-1.30), renal parenchymal defects (OR = 1.149; 95% CI 0.75-1.754), and renal scarring (OR = 1.042; 95% CI 0.72-1.50). However, the risk of developing pyelonephritis after surgical treatment of VUR was lesser than that in the conservative approach, that is, antibiotics (OR = 0.345; 95% CI 0.126-0.946.), positive urine culture (OR = 0.617; 95% CI 0.428-0.890), and recurrent UTIs were more common in the placebo group than in the antibiotic group (p < 0.05; OR = 0.639; 95% CI 0.436-0.936) which is statistically significant.
conclusionBased on current research, we recommend that a child with a UTI and significant VUR be treated conservatively at first, with surgical care reserved for children who have issues with antimicrobials or have clinically significant VUR that persists after several years of follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.