Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34555725›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular graphics & modelling2021

dockECR: Open consensus docking and ranking protocol for virtual screening of small molecules.

Rodrigo Ochoa, Karen Palacio-Rodriguez, Camila M Clemente, Natalia S Adler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular graphics & modelling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Large-Scale Docking in the Cloud.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigo OchoaBiophysics of Tropical Diseases, Max Planck Tandem Group, University of Antioquia, 050010, Medellin, Colombia. Electronic address: rodrigo.ochoa@udea.edu.co.
Karen Palacio-RodriguezBiophysics of Tropical Diseases, Max Planck Tandem Group, University of Antioquia, 050010, Medellin, Colombia.
Camila M ClementeInstituto Académico Pedagógico de Ciencias Básicas y Aplicadas, Universidad Nacional de Villa María, 5900, Villa María, Córdoba, Argentina.
Natalia S AdlerLaboratorio de Química Medicinal, Centro de Investigaciones en Bionanociencias (CIBION)-CONICET, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; Computational Drug Design and Biomedical Informatics Laboratory, Translational Medicine Research Institute (IIMT), CONICET-Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Universidad de Antioquia · COConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational University of Villa María · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of open computational pipelines to accelerate the discovery of treatments for emerging diseases allows finding novel solutions in shorter periods of time. Consensus molecular docking is one of these approaches, and its main purpose is to increase the detection of real actives within virtual screening campaigns. Here we present dockECR, an open consensus docking and ranking protocol that implements the exponential consensus ranking method to prioritize molecular candidates. The protocol uses four open source molecular docking programs: AutoDock Vina, Smina, LeDock and rDock, to rank the molecules. In addition, we introduce a scoring strategy based on the average RMSD obtained from comparing the best poses from each single program to complement the consensus ranking with information about the predicted poses. The protocol was benchmarked using 15 relevant protein targets with known actives and decoys, and applied using the main protease of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. For the application, different crystal structures of the protease, and frames obtained from molecular dynamics simulations were used to dock a library of 79 molecules derived from previously co-crystallized fragments. The ranking obtained with dockECR was used to prioritize eight candidates, which were evaluated in terms of the interactions generated with key residues from the protease. The protocol can be implemented in any virtual screening campaign involving proteins as molecular targets. The dockECR code is publicly available at: https://github.com/rochoa85/dockECR.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2ConsensusHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationLigandsExponential consensus rankingMolecular dockingOpen sourceSARS-CoV-2 main proteaseVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID34555725
PMCPMC8442548
OpenAlexW3200170115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.