Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34555161›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2021

A discussion of syndromic molecular testing for clinical care.

Hayley Cassidy, Mart Van Genne, Erley Lizarazo-Forero, Lilli Gard, Hubert G M Niesters

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Respiratory Pathogen Panels in Lung Transplantation.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hayley CassidyThe University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mart Van GenneThe University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erley Lizarazo-ForeroThe University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lilli GardThe University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hubert G M NiestersThe University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Marie Curie 713660-PRONKJEWAIL-H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current molecular detection methods for single or multiplex pathogens by real-time PCR generally offer great sensitivity and specificity. However, many infectious pathogens often result in very similar clinical presentations, complicating the test-order for physicians who have to narrow down the causative agent prior to in-house PCR testing. As a consequence, the intuitive response is to start empirical therapy to treat a broad spectrum of possible pathogens. Syndromic molecular testing has been increasingly integrated into routine clinical care, either to provide diagnostic, epidemiological or patient management information. These multiplex panels can be used to screen for predefined infectious disease pathogens simultaneously within a 1 h timeframe, creating opportunities for rapid diagnostics. Conversely, syndromic panels have their own challenges and must be adaptable to the evolving demands of the clinical setting. Firstly, questions have been raised regarding the clinical relevance of some of the targets included in the panels and secondly, there is the added expense of integration into the clinical laboratory. Here, we aim to discuss some of the factors that should be considered before performing syndromic testing rather than traditional low-plex in-house PCR.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesHumansMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID34555161
PMCPMC8460109
OpenAlexW3200921307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.