Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34555092›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Inattentional blindness in anesthesiology: A gorilla is worth one thousand words.

Alessandro De Cassai, Sebastiano Negro, Federico Geraldini, Annalisa Boscolo, Nicolò Sella, Marina Munari, Paolo Navalesi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Inattentional blindness in medicine.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Editorial: Interfascial Plane Blocks.Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandro De CassaiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9773-1832
Sebastiano NegroDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9298-311X
Federico GeraldiniAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Annalisa BoscoloAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Nicolò SellaDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Marina MunariAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Paolo NavalesiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople are not able to anticipate unexpected events. Inattentional blindness is demonstrated to happen not only in naïve observers engaged in an unfamiliar task but also in field experts with years of training. Anaesthesia is the perfect example of a discipline which requires a high level of attention and our aim was to evaluate if inattentional blindness can affect anesthesiologists during their daily activities. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn online survey was distributed on Facebook between May 1, 2021 and May 31, 2021. The survey consisted of five simulated cases with questions investigating the anesthetic management of day-case surgeries. Each case had an introduction, a chest radiography, an electrocardiogram, preoperative blood testing and the last case had a gorilla embedded in the chest radiography.

resultsIn total 699 respondents from 17 different countries were finally included in the analysis. The main outcome was to assess the incidence of inattentional blindness. Only 34 (4.9%) respondents were able to spot the gorilla. No differences were found between anesthesiologists or residents, private or public hospitals, or between medical doctors with different experience. DISCUSSION: Our findings assess that inattentional blindness is common in anesthesia, and ever-growing attention is deemed necessary to improve patient safety; to achieve this objective several strategies should be adopted such as an increased use of standardized protocols, promoting automation based strategies to reduce human error when performing repetitive tasks and discouraging evaluation of multiple consecutive patients in the same work shifts independently of the associated complexity.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyAttentionAdultAnesthesiaAnesthesiologistsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34555092
PMCPMC8459955
OpenAlexW3201362030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.