Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34554604›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022

Absolute choline tissue concentration mapping for prostate cancer localization and characterization using 3D

Nassim Tayari, Alan J Wright, Arend Heerschap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nassim TayariDepartment of Medical Imaging (Radiology), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alan J WrightDepartment of Medical Imaging (Radiology), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4577-5681
Arend HeerschapDepartment of Medical Imaging (Radiology), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9930-4562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUntil now,

methodsEight prostate cancer patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy underwent multi-parametric MRI at 3 T, including 3D water-unsuppressed semi-LASER MRSI. A postprocessing algorithm was developed to remove the water signal and its artifacts and use the extracted water signal as intravoxel reference for phase and frequency correction of metabolite signals and for absolute metabolite quantification.

resultsWater-unsuppressed MRSI with dedicated postprocessing produced water signal and artifact-free MR spectra throughout the prostate. In all patients, the absolute choline tissue concentration was significantly higher in tumorous than in benign tissue areas (mean ± SD: 7.2 ± 1.4 vs 3.8 ± 0.7 mM), facilitating tumor localization by choline mapping. Tumor tissue levels of choline correlated better with the commonly used (choline + spermine + creatine)/citrate ratio (r = 0.78 ± 0.1) than that of citrate (r = 0.21 ± 0.06). The highest maximum choline concentrations occurred in high-risk cancer foci.

conclusionThis report presents the first successful water-unsuppressed MRSI of the whole prostate. The water signal enabled amelioration of spectral quality and absolute metabolite quantification. In this way, choline tissue levels were identified as tumor biomarker. Choline mapping may serve as a tool in prostate cancer localization and risk scoring in multi-parametric MRI for diagnosis and biopsy procedures.

Indexed as

CholineProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleProstateWaterCholineWater1H MR spectroscopic imagingabsolute quantificationcholineprostate cancerwater signal

Identifiers

PMID34554604
PMCPMC9290642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.