Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34554593›Full record

ArticleThe Veterinary record2021

Exploring farmers' understanding of and responses to endemic animal health and welfare issues in the UK.

Niamh Mahon, Beth Clark, Amy Proctor, Lewis Holloway

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Veterinary record, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Niamh MahonDepartment of Geography, Geology and Environment, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, UK.
Beth ClarkCentre for Rural Economy, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9828-6806
Amy ProctorCentre for Rural Economy, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Lewis HollowayDepartment of Geography, Geology and Environment, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 209818/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 209818/Z/17/Z "Thinking Forward Through the Past"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper uses two endemic health conditions to explore farmer understandings of and responses to livestock health and welfare issues.

methodsThe findings are based on a survey of 42 livestock farmers in the north of England, exploring how they manage lameness in sheep and cattle and bovine viral diarrhoea in cattle. We identify similarities and differences in their approaches.

resultsTwo themes emerge. (1) The importance of difference between animal types (i.e., beef cattle, dairy cattle and sheep), which highlights the 'complex' and 'multifactorial' nature of animal health and welfare. It is necessary to unpack this to understand the interplay of animal, resource and management issues in farmer responses. (2) Previous research has identified 'lack of knowledge' as a key welfare issue. Our findings reveal farmers are in fact seeking, acquiring and sharing knowledge on practices related to the management of animal health however individual circumstance and context influence how this translates in practice.

conclusionOur research highlights the importance of integrating different perspectives and knowledges as a way of understanding and responding to animal health and welfare concerns. Facilitating knowledge exchange both within and between different groups and sectors is vital in achieving this.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareFarmersAnimalsCattleHumansLivestockSheepSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34554593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.