Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34554544›Full record

ArticleBiologia futura2019

Allelic variation in candidate genes associated with wood properties of cultivated poplars (Populus).

Zoltán Attila Köbölkuti, Klára Cseke, Attila Benke, Mátyás Báder, Attila Borovics, Róbert Németh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biologia futura, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zoltán Attila KöbölkutiDepartment of Tree Breeding, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Forest Research Institute, Várkerulet 30/A, Sárvár, 9600, Hungary. kobolkuti.zoltan@erti.naik.hu.
Klára CsekeDepartment of Tree Breeding, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Forest Research Institute, Várkerulet 30/A, Sárvár, 9600, Hungary.
Attila BenkeDepartment of Tree Breeding, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Forest Research Institute, Várkerulet 30/A, Sárvár, 9600, Hungary.
Mátyás BáderSimonyi Karoly Faculty of Engineering, Wood Sciences and Applied Arts, University of Sopron, Bajcsy Zs. u. 4, 9400, Sopron, Hungary.
Attila BorovicsDepartment of Tree Breeding, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Forest Research Institute, Várkerulet 30/A, Sárvár, 9600, Hungary.
Róbert NémethSimonyi Karoly Faculty of Engineering, Wood Sciences and Applied Arts, University of Sopron, Bajcsy Zs. u. 4, 9400, Sopron, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince Populus has veritable value as timber, plywood, pulp, and paper, genomic research should create the sound basis for further breeding toward desirable wood quality attributes. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, we addressed the need for a research methodology that initially identifies and then characterize candidate genes encoding enzymes with wood property phenotypic traits, toward the aim of developing a genomics-based breeding technology.

resultsOn 23 different poplar species/hybrid samples, we successfully amplified 55 primers designed on Populus trichocarpa L. Considering the number of polymorphic sites, out of 73,206 bp, 51 SNPs and 31 indel events were found. Non-synonymous single base mutations could be detected in number of 30, 21 out of 164 sequences were the number of minimum recombination events and 41 significant pairwise comparisons between loci could be detected. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionOur results provide a roadmap for a future association genetic study between nucleotide diversity and precise evaluation of phenotype.

Indexed as

PopulusSNP markerswood property

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.