ArticleBiologia futura2019
Analysis of aristolochlic acids and evaluation of antibacterial activity of Aristolochia clematitis L.
Article in Biologia futura, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potentiation of the Pharmacological Effects of anPharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Review on NMR spectroscopic data and recent analytical methods of aristolochic acids and derivatives in Aristolochia herbs.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2025Review
- Tiryāq in traditional Persian medicine: a survey of antidotal plants and their modern pharmacological potential.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Article
- Biologically active secondary metabolites from white-rot fungi.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Review
- Bioactive Compounds ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSeveral Aristolochia species were used as medicinal herb across Europe and in recent years, their antimicrobial activity has also been investigated. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, A. clematitis was selected to evaluate the aristolochic acids I and II (AA I and AA II) concentrations and the antimicrobial activity of methanol, hexane, butanol, and ethyl acetate extracts of the root, stem, leaf, root, and fruit. AA I and AA II contents were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method.
resultsEach fraction of the plant contained AA I and AA II and the root was found to have the highest contents of AA I (1.09%) and AA II (0.7454%). The minimum inhibitory concentrations of all extracts were determined by standard microdilution method. The fruit's extracts showed the most efficient antimicrobial effect against both methicillin sensitive and resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains.
conclusionCorrelation between the AA I and AA II concentrations and the antimicrobial effect was not found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34554540What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.