Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34554491›Full record

ArticleBiologia futura2021

Writing a strong scientific paper in medicine and the biomedical sciences: a checklist and recommendations for early career researchers.

Payam Behzadi, Márió Gajdács

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biologia futura, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Complete genetic characterization of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Lumbar Spine Infection withInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Whole genome sequencing andData in brief · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Removal of Erythromycin and Its Effects on Anaerobic Fermentation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antimicrobial activity of Bacillus sp. isolated strains of wild honey.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Payam BehzadiDepartment of Microbiology, College of Basic Sciences, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, 37541-374, Iran.
Márió GajdácsInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Nagyvárad tér 4, 1089, Hungary. mariopharma92@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-0365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific writing is an important skill in both academia and clinical practice. The skills for writing a strong scientific paper are necessary for researchers (comprising academic staff and health-care professionals). The process of a scientific research will be completed by reporting the obtained results in the form of a strong scholarly publication. Therefore, an insufficiency in scientific writing skills may lead to consequential rejections. This feature results in undesirable impact for their academic careers, promotions and credits. Although there are different types of papers, the original article is normally the outcome of experimental/epidemiological research. On the one hand, scientific writing is part of the curricula for many medical programs. On the other hand, not every physician may have adequate knowledge on formulating research results for publication adequately. Hence, the present review aimed to introduce the details of creating a strong original article for publication (especially for novice or early career researchers).

Indexed as

Career MobilityHumansResearch DesignResearch PersonnelWritingAbstracting and indexingAcademic trainingClinical medicineMedical publicationsPeer reviewPublicationsScientific research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.