ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Air quality prediction using CNN+LSTM-based hybrid deep learning architecture.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Air quality prediction via hybrid BiGRU-MLP using binary ant colony optimization and firefly algorithm for hyperparameter tuning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Demographic and emission drivers of household air pollution in biomass using communities.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mixed Forecast of Air Quality Index with a Bibranch Parallel Architecture Considering Seasonal Heterogeneity.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intelligent prediction of air quality index based on the transformer-BiLSTM model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Data-Driven Techniques for Air Pollution Concentration Forecasting.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advanced air quality prediction using multimodal data and dynamic modeling techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Novel hybrid data-driven modeling based on feature space reconstruction and multihead self-attention gated recurrent unit: applied to PM2.5 concentrations prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- RETRACTED: Interpretable machine learning framework for predicting Urban air quality.PloS one · 2025Article
- Time-Series Forecasting of PMSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Schlieren imaging and video classification of alphabet pronunciations: exploiting phonetic flows for speech recognition and speech therapy.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2024Article
- Integrated smart dust monitoring and prediction system for surface mine sites using IoT and machine learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Uncovering local aggregated air quality index with smartphone captured images leveraging efficient deep convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Deep Spatio-Temporal Graph Network with Self-Optimization for Air Quality Prediction.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Prediction and assessment of the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on air quality over Kolkata: a deep transfer learning approach.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air pollution prediction based on variables in environmental monitoring data gains further importance with increasing concerns about climate change and the sustainability of cities. Modeling of the complex relationships between these variables by sophisticated methods in machine learning is a promising field. The objectives of this work are to develop a supervised model for the prediction of air pollution by using real sensor data and to transfer the model between cities. The combination of a convolutional neural network and a long short-term memory deep neural network model was proposed to predict the concentration of air pollutants in multiple locations of a city by using spatial-temporal relationships. Two approaches have been adopted: the univariate model contains the information of one pollutant whereas the multivariate model contains the information of all pollutants and meteorology data for prediction. The study was carried out for different pollutants which are in the publicly available data of the cities of Barcelona, Kocaeli, and İstanbul. The hyperparameters of the model (filter, frame, and batch sizes; number of convolutional/LSTM layers and hidden units; learning rate; and parameters for sample selection, pooling, and validation) were tuned to determine the architecture that achieved the lowest test error. The proposed model improved the prediction performance (measured by the root mean square error) by 11-53% for particulate matter, 20-31% for ozone, 9-47% for nitrogenoxides, and 18-46% for sulfurdioxide with respect to the 1-hidden layer long short-term memory networks utilized in the literature. The multivariate model without using meteorological data revealed the best results. Regarding transfer learning, the network weights were transferred from the source city to the target city. The model has more accurate prediction performance with the transfer of the network from Kocaeli to İstanbul as those neighbor cities have similar air pollution and meteorological characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34554404What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.