Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34554389›Full record

ArticleOral radiology2022

Intelligent quantitative assessment of skeletal maturation based on multi-stage model: a retrospective cone-beam CT study of cervical vertebrae.

Lizhe Xie, Wen Tang, Iman Izadikhah, Xiaoyu Chen, Zhenqi Zhao, Yang Zhao, Hu Li, Bin Yan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oral radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Determination of cervical vertebral maturation using machine learning in lateral cephalograms.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lizhe Xie *Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Wen Tang *Department of Orthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 136 Hanzhong Street, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Iman IzadikhahDepartment of Orthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 136 Hanzhong Street, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Xiaoyu ChenDepartment of Orthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 136 Hanzhong Street, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Zhenqi ZhaoDepartment of Stomatology, The First People's Hospital of Nantong, Nantong, China.
Yang ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hu LiDepartment of Orthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 136 Hanzhong Street, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Bin YanDepartment of Orthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 136 Hanzhong Street, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, China. byan@njmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-9169-4615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop new logistic regression estimative models of the cervical vertebral maturation index (CVMI) based on cone-beam CT (CBCT)-derived parameters for intelligent evaluating skeletal maturation.

methodsFrom 231 CBCT volumes (age range 7-17, mean age 11.09 years), 154 were randomly selected to produce 2D sagittal projections of the second to fourth cervical vertebrae (C2-C4). From 19 quantitative parameters, significant predictors were deduced to formulate logistic models. Using the CVMI and significant predictors of 77 other subjects, performance of the models was externally examined by direct comparison and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Models were modified if required, to improve their accuracy.

resultsChronological age, C3 height ([Formula: see text], and ratio of posterior height to lower width of C4 [Formula: see text] were entered as significant predictors. Accuracy of the models was acceptable (total AUC = 0.91) except for 4th and 5th stage (AUC of 0.82 and 0.83, respectively), which were mis-predicted inversely. Adjusted models were generated by bivariate logistic regression analysis and adding significant parameters ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], with odds ratios of 3.308 and 3.38, respectively) from 58 subjects in 4th and 5th stages of CVMI in the model establishment group. The total AUC increased to 0.94, along with an increase in the accuracy of the latter optimized models to 77.9 and 87%, respectively.

conclusionThe new intelligent models reliably estimated skeletal maturation and can be utilized in the clinical field or machine learning-based skeletal maturation assessment.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeCone-Beam Computed TomographyAdolescentChildHumansRetrospective StudiesCervical vertebral maturation indexCone-beam computed tomographyMachine learningMulti-stage modelSkeletal maturation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.