ArticleOral radiology2022
Intelligent quantitative assessment of skeletal maturation based on multi-stage model: a retrospective cone-beam CT study of cervical vertebrae.
Article in Oral radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Radiographic choice for skeletal maturation assessment: a systematic review of Cervical Vertebrae Method and Middle Phalanx Method.Oral radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Performance of artificial intelligence on cervical vertebral maturation assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Neural networks for classification of cervical vertebrae maturation: a systematic review.The Angle orthodontist · 2022Pooled it
- Prediction of Skeletal Age Through Cervical Vertebral Measurements Using Different Machine Learning Regression Methods.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Deep learning based quantitative cervical vertebral maturation analysis.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
- Mapping the Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Analysis for Clinical Decision-Making in Dentistry: A Scoping Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
- Determination of cervical vertebral maturation using machine learning in lateral cephalograms.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2024Article
- Cervical Vertebral Maturation Assessment using various Machine Learning techniques on Lateral cephalogram: A systematic literature review.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop new logistic regression estimative models of the cervical vertebral maturation index (CVMI) based on cone-beam CT (CBCT)-derived parameters for intelligent evaluating skeletal maturation.
methodsFrom 231 CBCT volumes (age range 7-17, mean age 11.09 years), 154 were randomly selected to produce 2D sagittal projections of the second to fourth cervical vertebrae (C2-C4). From 19 quantitative parameters, significant predictors were deduced to formulate logistic models. Using the CVMI and significant predictors of 77 other subjects, performance of the models was externally examined by direct comparison and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Models were modified if required, to improve their accuracy.
resultsChronological age, C3 height ([Formula: see text], and ratio of posterior height to lower width of C4 [Formula: see text] were entered as significant predictors. Accuracy of the models was acceptable (total AUC = 0.91) except for 4th and 5th stage (AUC of 0.82 and 0.83, respectively), which were mis-predicted inversely. Adjusted models were generated by bivariate logistic regression analysis and adding significant parameters ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], with odds ratios of 3.308 and 3.38, respectively) from 58 subjects in 4th and 5th stages of CVMI in the model establishment group. The total AUC increased to 0.94, along with an increase in the accuracy of the latter optimized models to 77.9 and 87%, respectively.
conclusionThe new intelligent models reliably estimated skeletal maturation and can be utilized in the clinical field or machine learning-based skeletal maturation assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34554389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.