Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34554383›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2021

Contextual Considerations and Recommendations for Estimating the Value of Alzheimer's Disease Therapies.

T Joseph Mattingly, R Brett McQueen, Pei-Jung Lin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T Joseph MattinglyPatient-Driven Values in Healthcare Evaluation (PAVE) Center at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch Street, 12th Floor, Room 224, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. jmattingly@rx.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-5780
R Brett McQueenPharmaceutical Value (pValue) Initiative at the Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4302-2678
Pei-Jung LinCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pipeline for new treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the USA contains over 100 different agents, 80% of which can be categorized as disease-modifying therapies. The regulatory approval of the disease-modifying agent aducanumab has brought more attention to the complexity of the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of AD and the difficult decisions payers and policy makers will face over the next few years as innovation continues in this space. The value of AD treatment can vary widely according to the perspective of the analysis, sources of data, and methodological approach for the value assessment. This article focuses on AD-specific data gaps and measurement challenges and provides guidance for evidence generation to facilitate better value assessments for future AD treatments.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.