Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34554277›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022

[Vaccination willingness against COVID-19 among healthcare workers in Germany : Results from a University Medicine Network survey between November 2020 and January 2021].

Caterina Schug, Yesim Erim, Franziska Geiser, Nina Hiebel, Petra Beschoner, Lucia Jerg-Bretzke, Christian Albus, Kerstin Weidner, Susann Steudte-Schmiedgen, Andrea Borho and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Caterina SchugPsychosomatische und Psychotherapeutische Abteilung, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. caterina.schug@uk-erlangen.de.
Yesim ErimPsychosomatische und Psychotherapeutische Abteilung, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Franziska GeiserKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
Nina HiebelKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
Petra BeschonerKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
Lucia Jerg-BretzkeKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
Christian AlbusKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinik, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
Kerstin WeidnerKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Universitätsklinikum C. G. Carus, Medizinische Fakultät, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Susann Steudte-SchmiedgenKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Universitätsklinikum C. G. Carus, Medizinische Fakultät, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Andrea BorhoPsychosomatische und Psychotherapeutische Abteilung, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Marietta LiebPsychosomatische und Psychotherapeutische Abteilung, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Eva MorawaPsychosomatische und Psychotherapeutische Abteilung, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DETU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic is a continuing burden on society and the health system. The vaccination willingness among healthcare workers is of particular interest, as these groups play a key role in the pandemic response.

objectivesThe present study investigated how the willingness of healthcare workers in Germany to get vaccinated depends on sociodemographic, occupational, and COVID-19-specific characteristics, as well as mental health.

methodsBetween November 2020 and January 2021, 6217 employees in the German healthcare system were questioned about their vaccination willingness, sociodemographic, occupational, COVID-19-specific, and psychosocial characteristics using the online VOICE survey within the framework of the University Medicine Network (NUM).

resultsThe vaccination willingness of the sample group was 65.3%. A higher vaccination willingness was associated with male gender; age > 40 years; having no children or no migration background; not working in direct patient care; belonging to a COVID-19 risk group or professional group of physicians and psychologists in comparison with nursing staff; feeling sufficiently informed about COVID-19 and protected by the measures of the national or local authorities and the employer; fear of infection; and lack of signs of depression. Physicians showed the highest willingness to get vaccinated.

conclusionsDuring the study period, an overall moderate vaccination willingness against COVID-19 in the health sector was described. Information about the disease and vaccination, especially for younger people, females, and non-physicians, adequate protective measures and prevention of depressive symptoms could increase the vaccination willingness.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultFemaleGermanyHealth PersonnelHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2UniversitiesVaccinationAcceptanceCOVID-19-vaccinationHealthcare workersMental burdenPredictors

Identifiers

PMID34554277
PMCPMC8458789
OpenAlexW3199199482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.