Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2022
Low- vs high-dose ARNI effects on clinical status, exercise performance and cardiac function in real-life HFrEF patients.
Observational study in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of low-dose sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Delayed left ventricular remodelling in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review.Open heart · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes according to the average daily dose of sacubitril/valsartan: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes following sacubitril/valsartan therapy for chronic HFrEF: an Italian real-world multicentre study.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Predictors of reverse cardiac remodeling after sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- New Fuels for a Failing Engine: The Impact of Novel Heart Failure Drugs on Functional Capacity.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Comparing High- Versus Low-Dose Entresto in Heart Failure Patients: A 2025 Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2025Review
- Discontinuation rates, clinical effects and provocation factors of SGLT-2 inhibitor in the real world.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Vericiguat in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: hope or solid reality?Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Left ventricular reverse remodeling following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and low blood pressure.Heart and vessels · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan after six months in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and asymptomatic hypotension.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023Article
- The Long-Term Benefit of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients with HFrEF: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study in a Real World Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Effects of sacubitril/valsartan on exercise capacity: a prognostic improvement that starts during uptitration.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Article
- Target versus sub-target dose of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on survival in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOnly a few studies are available on dose-related effects of sacubitril/valsartan (angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition (ARNI)) in real-life patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We sought to investigate clinical and functional effects in real-life HFrEF patients receiving ARNI at a different cumulative dose.
methodsThis was an observational study in consecutive outpatients admitted for HFrEF from October 2017 to June 2019. The PARADIGM criteria were needed for enrolment. ARNI was uptitrated according to blood pressure, drug tolerability, renal function and kaliemia. At least 10-month follow-up was required in each patient. Clinical assessment, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, 6-min walk test and strain echocardiography were performed in each patient on a regular basis during the observational period. At the end of the study, patients were divided into two groups based on the median yearly dose of the ARNI medication.
resultsA total of 90 patients, 64 ± 11 years, 82% males, were enrolled. The cut-off dose was established in 75 mg BID, and the study population was divided into group A (≤ 75 mg), 52 patients (58%), and group B (> 75 mg), 38 patients (42%). The follow-up duration was 12 months (range 11-13). NYHA class, KCCQ score and 6MWT performance ameliorated in both groups, with a quicker time to benefit in group B. The proportion of patients walking > 350 m increased from 21 to 58% in group A (p < 0.001), and from 29 to 82% in group B (p < 0.001). A positive effect was also disclosed in the left ventricular remodelling, strain deformation and diastolic function.
conclusionOne-year ARNI treatment was effective in our real-life HFrEF patient population, leading to clinical and functional improvement in both study groups, slightly greater and with a shorter time to benefit in group B.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.