Trial reportJournal of rehabilitation medicine2021
Comparison of attention process training and activity-based attention training after acquired brain injury: A randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Two Different Multicomponent Cognitive-Motor Training Protocols on EEG Spectral Activity, Cognitive-Motor Interference, and Gait Performance in Individuals with Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Rehabilitation with intensive attention training early after acquired brain injury promotes better long-term status on health-related quality of life, daily activities, work ability and return to work.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the effects of 2 interventions for attention deficits in people with acquired brain injury, Attention Process Training (APT) and Activity--based Attention Training (ABAT), on activity and participation.
designRandomized controlled study. PATIENTS: The study included 51 patients in out-patient rehabilitation 4-12 months after stroke or traumatic brain injury.
methodsIntervention: 20 h of attention training. MEASUREMENTS: Assessment of Work Performance (AWP), Work Ability Index (WAI), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), and Rating Scale of Attentional Behavior (RSAB).
resultsBetween-group comparisons showed significantly improved process skills after APT: Mental Energy (p = 0.000, ES = 1.84), Knowledge (p = 0.003, ES = 1.78), Temporal Organization (p = 0.000, ES=1.43) and Adaptation (p = 0.001, ES = 1.59). For within-group comparisons significant improvement was found between pre- and post-measures for both groups on COPM Performance (APT: p = 0.001, ES=1.85; ABAT: p = 0.001, ES = 1.84) and Satisfaction (APT: p = 0.000, ES=1.92; ABAT: p = 0.000, ES = 2.40) and RSAB Total Score (ABAT: p = 0.027, ES = 0.81; APT: p = 0.007, ES = 1.03).
conclusionWe found significant differences favouring APT before ABAT for process skills (AWP). There were no discernible differences in global measures of activity between the 2 approaches: both groups improved significantly, as indicated by ES. The results of this study highlight the complexities of influencing behaviour on the level of body functions while measuring effects on activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.