ArticleJAMA network open2021
Epidemiologic Trends of and Factors Associated With Overall Survival for Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
176 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 238 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Utility of EUS-FNA/FNB for Diagnosis and Grade Assessment in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors < 20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Gender impact on pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN) prognosis according to survival nomograms.Endocrine · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of Sex and Deprivation on Neuroendocrine Tumour Survival: Challenges of Heterogeneous Data.Neuroendocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Metabolism of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: what can omics tell us?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Dosimetry Results from the Phase 1b/3 ACTION-1 Trial of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and evaluation of dose-response relationship of selective internal radiation therapy for the management of liver metastases in neuroendocrine neoplasia.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Trial
- Endoscopic mucosal resection using anchored snare Tip-in versus precut technique for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Trial
- The Use of Adjunct Therapies with Surgery for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Indications, Timing, and Outcomes.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Primary Resection and Metastasectomy for Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A National Cancer Database Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Predicting Remnant Tumor After Incomplete Resection of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: The KASID Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Observational
- Patient characteristics and prognostic factors in advanced treatment lines in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Estimation of Future Patient Populations Eligible for Radioligand Therapies in the EU and the UK: A Modelling Study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- [EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Expanded GEP-NET organoid culture for personalized therapy evaluation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Quantitative SPECT imaging for predicting therapeutic response to lutetium-177 DOTATATE in neuroendocrine tumors.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a SEER-based prediction model for survival in poorly and undifferentiated colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Impact of Symptom Phenotype on Surgical Quality and Survival in Small-Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Quality Metrics Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Integrated genomics and transcriptomics reveal key events in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Targeting the ferritinophagy-lysosome axis as a therapeutic vulnerability in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Although the incidence and prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have been thought to have increased during the past decades, updated epidemiologic and survival data are lacking. Objectives: To conduct an epidemiologic and survival analysis of the largest cohort of patients with GEP-NETs using the latest data and to establish a novel nomogram to predict the survival probability of individual patients with GEP-NETs. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, 43 751 patients with GEP-NETs diagnosed from January 1, 1975, to December 31, 2015, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Associated data were used for epidemiologic and survival analysis, as well as the establishment and validation of a nomogram to predict the survival probability of individual patients with GEP-NETs. The study cutoff date was December 31, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed from February 1 to April 30, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence, factors associated with overall survival, and a nomogram model for patients with GEP-NETs. Results: A total of 43 751 patients received a diagnosis of GEP-NETs from 1975 to 2015 (22 398 women [51.2%], 31 976 White patients [73.1%], 7097 Black patients [16.2%], 3207 Asian and Pacific Islander patients [7.3%], 270 American Indian and Alaska Native patients [0.6%], and 4546 patients of unknown race [10.4%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 58 [15] years). The age-adjusted incidence rate of GEP-NETs increased 6.4-fold from 1975 to 2015 (annual percentage change [APC], 4.98; 95% CI, 4.75-5.20; P < .001). Furthermore, among site groups, the incidence of GEP-NETs in the rectum increased most significantly (APC, 6.43; 95% CI, 5.65-7.23; P < .001). As for stage and grade, the incidence increased the most in localized GEP-NETs (APC, 6.53; 95% CI, 6.08-6.97; P < .001) and G1 GEP-NETs (APC, 18.93; 95% CI, 17.44-20.43; P < .001). During the study period, the mean age at diagnosis for localized disease increased by 9.0 years (95% CI, 3.3-14.7 years; P = .002), which remained unchanged for regional and distant cases. On multivariable analyses, age, sex, marital status, and tumor size, grade, stage, and site were significantly associated with overall survival for patients with GEP-NETs (eg, patients with distant vs localized disease: hazard ratio, 10.32; 95% CI, 8.56-12.43; G4 vs G1 GEP-NET: hazard ratio, 6.37; 95% CI, 5.39-7.53). Furthermore, a nomogram comprising age, size, grade, stage, and site was established to predict the 3-year and 5-year survival probability, with the concordance indexes of 0.893 (95% CI, 0.883-0.903) for the internal validations and 0.880 (95% CI, 0.866-0.894) for the external validations. The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the nomogram exhibited better discrimination power than TNM classification (area under the curve for 3-year overall survival, 0.908 vs 0.795; for 5-year overall survival, 0.893 vs 0.791). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the incidence and prevalence of GEP-NETs have continued to increase over 40 years, especially among patients with rectal GEP-NETs. In addition, this study suggests that a nomogram with 5 prognostic parameters may accurately quantify the risk of death among patients with GEP-NETs, indicating that it has satisfactory clinical practicality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.