Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34554182›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2021

Modeling refractive correction strategies in keratoconus.

Jos J Rozema, Gareth D Hastings, Jason Marsack, Carina Koppen, Raymond A Applegate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of contact lens correction on wavefront aberrations and vision quality in keratoconus.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Utilising a visual image quality metric to optimise spectacle prescriptions for eyes with keratoconus.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Influence of rigid lens decentration and rotation on visual image quality in normal and keratoconic eyes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
  7. Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jos J RozemaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Gareth D HastingsCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Jason MarsackCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Carina KoppenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Raymond A ApplegateCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Optical aberration and visual performance in highly aberrated eyesR01EY019105 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI APPLEGATE, RAYMOND A, MARSACK, JASON D · 2009 to 2018
$2.9M
ABERRATIONS OF EYES IN NORMAL CLINICAL POPULATIONR01EY008520 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI APPLEGATE, RAYMOND A · 1991 to 2010
$2.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008520NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work intends to determine the optimal refractive spectacle and scleral lens corrections for keratoconus patients using the visual Strehl (VSX) visual image quality metric and the SyntEyes models with the synthetic biometry of 20 normal eyes and 20 keratoconic eyes. These included the corneal tomography and intraocular biometry. A series of virtual spherocylindrical spectacle and scleral lens corrections spanning the entire phoropter range were separately applied to each eye, followed by ray tracing to determine the residual wavefront aberrations and identify the correction with the highest possible VSX (named a "focus"). To speed up calculations, a smart scanning algorithm was used, consisting of three consecutive scans over increasingly finer dioptric grids. In the dioptric space, the VSX pattern for normal eyes considered over the correction range for either spectacle or scleral lens corrections resembled an hourglass with one distinct focus and a quick drop in VSX away from that focus. For 18 of the 20 keratoconic eyes, the spectacle-corrected VSX pattern resembled a shell that in 9 of the 20 cases showed two foci separated by a large dioptric distance (13.3 ± 4.9 diopters). In keratoconic eyes, scleral lenses also produced hourglass patterns, but with a VSX lower than in normal eyes. The hourglass pattern in dioptric space shows how, in normal eyes, the refracting process automatically funnels practitioners toward the optimal correction. The shell patterns in keratoconus, however, present far more complexity and, possibly, multiple foci. Depending on the starting point, refracting procedures may lead to a local maximum rather than the optimal correction.

Indexed as

KeratoconusCorneaHumansRefraction, OcularScleraVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID34554182
PMCPMC8475278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.